Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mg and Lillie a Johnson Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$14MEducation$13MHuman Services$2.8MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.9MArts & Culture$818kHousing & Shelter$643kEmployment$500kFood & Nutrition$428kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 36 grants below total $8,779,323, the rows itemized in this filing. The $10,029,941 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,250,618 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $187k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+8 grants · $6.8M
$87,250
Median grant
—
States reached
$124M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Citizens Medical Center$3,259,200
Victoria College$1,327,000
Wharton County Junior College$562,000
Jackson County Hospital District$409,173
University of Houston-Victoria$350,000
The Crisis Center$350,000
Northside Center, Inc.$300,000
Food Bank of the Golden Crescent$290,000
Billy T. Cattan Recovery Outreach Center$200,000
Lavaca Medical Center$200,000
OakBend Medical Center$110,000
Friends of Elder Citizens$100,000
Refugio County Memorial Hospital$100,000
Friends of the Port O'Connor Library$100,000
Berclair Volunteer Fire Department$99,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HESEDS HOUSE OF WHARTON: $65k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21M · 28 repeat orgs$14M to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
68

Total granted

$21M
$13M

Still filing today

0%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $917k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    Victoria College
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6.0M
  • CM
    Citizens Medical Center
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5.5M
  • WC
    Wharton County Junior College
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.5M

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2021 · $2.3M
  • EC
    El Campo Memorial Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $1.5M
  • EC
    EL CAMPO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M · revenue -29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
El Campo Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department

—
2
Hankamer Volunteer Fire Department

Provide fire fighting & ambulance service to hankamer, texas and surrounding areas.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Garrison Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire and medical emergency services for the city of garrison, tx and the surrounding districts.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Waskom Volunteer Fire Department & Ems Services Inc

Firefighter & emergency medical services for the waskom, tx area.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Tolar Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department organized to contain fires in and around the city of tolar, county of hood, texas

Human Services
6
Melvin Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Pecan Plantation Volunteer Fire Dpt & Emergency Medical Services Inc

Provides protection of property and preservation of life from and during fire or other emergencies within the area of its operation in hood and johnson counties, texas. also, provides rescue and various other emergency services in the…

—
8
Frelsburg Volunteer Fire Dept

Provide firefighting services for frelsburg, texas area.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Hartley Volunteer Fire Dept & Ems

Multi-texas city and county fire department and ambulance service

Public Safety & Disaster
10
Clyde Volunteer Fire Department

To provide fire suppression, fire investigation, and search and rescue services to the citizens of clyde and the surrounding rural areas of callahan co., tx.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Industry Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire department for rural community centered in industry, tx

—
12
Hitchcock Volunteer Fire Department

Fire and rescue services for the community of hitchcock, texas.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Campo Memorial Hospital; the most unlike its peers is The Brownson Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 107 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
4/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Victoria College: $6,008,000 · OtherVictoria CollegeCitizens Medical Center: $5,474,200 · OtherCitizens Medical CenterWharton County Junior College: $2,543,000 · OtherWharton County Junior CollegeUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON: $2,300,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTONUniversity of Houston-Victoria: $1,550,000 · OtherEl Campo Memorial Hospital: $1,500,000 · Other+92 more: $13,893,896 · Other+92 moreEL CAMPO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $1,500,000 · HealthHESED HOUSE OF WHARTON INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesPERPETUAL HELP HOME INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesLamar Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $48,000 · Public Safety & DisasterHALLETTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $43,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BROWNSON HOME INC: $90,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EL CAMPO: $58,538 · Recreation & SportsChildrens Discovery Museum Inc: $25,000 · Arts & CultureGULF COAST CASA: $3,500 · Civil Rights
Other$33,269,096Health$1,500,000Human Services$125,000Public Safety & Disaster$91,000Housing & Shelter$90,000Recreation & Sports$58,538Arts & Culture$25,000Civil Rights$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL CAMPO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $1,500,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTHE BROWNSON HOME INC: $90,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHOSPICE OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $89,350 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHESED HOUSE OF WHARTON INC: $65,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetPERPETUAL HELP HOME INC: $60,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF EL CAMPO: $58,538 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetLamar Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $48,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetHALLETTSVILLE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $43,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetWOODSBORO FIRE DEPARTMENT: $39,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetChildrens Discovery Museum Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCITIZENS PROMOTING MEDICAL EXCELLENCE: $12,770 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetGULF COAST CASA: $3,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL CAMPO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kathryn O'Connor FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kathryn O'Connor Foundation · The O'Connor & Hewitt Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Gulf Coast Medical Foundation · Dickson-Allen Foundation · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mg and Lillie a Johnson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mg and Lillie a Johnson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mg and Lillie a Johnson Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mg and Lillie a Johnson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 107 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $12M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mg and Lillie a Johnson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph