Skip to content
Mf Hutchinson Jr Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Mf Hutchinson Jr Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$525k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$2.1MReligion$803kHealth$533kHuman Services$495kYouth Development$115kArts & Culture$30kHousing & Shelter$25kRecreation & Sports$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $430k
  • $250k+1 grant · $525k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MERCER UNIVERSITY$525,000
THE METHODIST HOME$150,000
YOUNG LIFE$110,000
ARC OF FLORIDA$100,000
CARING SOLUTIONS$70,000
INGLESIA HISPANA MONTE DE LOS OLIVO$35,000
STRATFORD ACADEMY$25,000
SOUTHERN TENNIS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE NUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA$10,000
UF HEALTH NEURODEVELOPMENT PEDIATRI$8,000
THE INDEPENDENCE FUND$6,300
SHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION$6,083
JP HALL CHILDRENS CHARITIES$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,500
MAC MENTORING AND ATHLETICS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FRIENDSHIP MISSION INC: $25k → 18%SHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%THE ARC OF MACON INC: $35k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 14 repeat orgs$701k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
10

Total granted

$4.4M
$470k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

57%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $231k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    STRATFORD ACADEMY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +17%
  • TC
    THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $575k · revenue +12%
  • CS
    CARING SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $175k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • KK
    KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ALBANY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -49%
  • TA
    THE ARC MACON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arc of Southwest Georgia Inc

Our mission is to create life-changing solutions for people with disabilities.

Human Services
2
The Arc of Alabama Inc

The arc of alabama provides services to advocate and aid individuals with cognitive, intellectual, and developmental disabilities in the state of alabama.

—
3
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
4
The Arc of South Carolina

To support and help all individuals with special needs to achieve recognition and acceptance as valued members of their communities.

—
5
The Arc Davidson County & Greater Nashville

The arc davidson county & greater nashville is a family-based organization that promotes, protects, and advocates for the right of people with intellectual/developmental disabilities to live self-determined, meaningful lives in inclusive…

Human Services
6
Special Olympics Mississippi Inc

The mission of special olympics is to provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing opportunities to develop…

Recreation & Sports
7
Annandale At Suwanee Inc

To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.

Health
8
Special Olympics Inc

Special olympics strives to create a better world by fostering the acceptance and inclusion of people of all abilities through sports, health and education programs.

Recreation & Sports
9
The Arc of Lancaster County

Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.

Health
10
Bryan Health

Bryan health's mission is to advance the health of individuals in our region through collaboration with physicians and communities.

Health
11
Mitchell's Place Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive, research-based services for children and families affected by autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities. we strive to unlock the potential of individuals affected by autism…

Health
12
University of Florida Jacksonville Physicians Inc

University of florida jacksonville physicians, inc. is dedicated to making a difference in the lives of those we serve by providing exceptional and innovative practice management in support of the university of florida college of medicine…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kennedy Krieger Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is J-Lo's Animal Rescue & Sanctuary in. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STRATFORD ACADEMY INC: $2,075,000 · EducationSTRATFORD ACADEMY INCTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $575,000 · EducationTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY+1 more: $10,000 · EducationTHE METHODIST HOME: $595,000 · OtherTHE METHODIST HOMEVINEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $470,000 · OtherVINEVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCHCHRIST CHAPEL ASSEMBLY OF GOD INC: $310,000 · OtherCHRIST CHAPEL ASSEMBLY OF GOD INCKENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INC: $250,000 · OtherKENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE INCTHE ARC OF FLORIDA INC: $130,000 · OtherTHE ARC OF FLORIDA INCCARING SOLUTIONS: $70,000 · Other+9 more: $126,500 · Other+9 moreCARING SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $175,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 · HealthHORSE SENSE & SENSITIVITY INC: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthYOUNG LIFE: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ALBANY INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE ARC MACON INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP MISSION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSHARE THE MAGIC FOUNDATION INC: $6,083 · Human ServicesNUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureThe Independence Fund Inc: $6,300 · Public BenefitJ-LO'S ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY IN: $4,000 · AnimalsALL SEATED IN A BARN: $2,000 · Animals
Education$2,660,000Other$1,951,500Health$245,000Youth Development$210,000Human Services$66,083Arts & Culture$40,000Public Benefit$6,300Animals$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTRATFORD ACADEMY INC: $2,075,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY: $575,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCARING SOLUTIONS OF CENTRAL GEORGIA INC: $175,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetTHE ARC OF FLORIDA INC: $130,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $110,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ALBANY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNUTCRACKER OF MIDDLE GEORGIA INC: $40,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetTHE ARC MACON INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MISSION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHORSE SENSE & SENSITIVITY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSOUTHERN TENNIS PATRONS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN HALL CHARITIES OF CLAY COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetLUTZIE 43 FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ-LO'S ANIMAL RESCUE & SANCTUARY IN: $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetALL SEATED IN A BARN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mf Hutchinson Jr Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mf Hutchinson Jr Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mf Hutchinson Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home