Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Metz Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$186k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Science & Tech$500kHealth$332kEducation$251kArts & Culture$34kCrime & Legal$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kFood & Nutrition$3kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $3k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $183k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEISINGER HEALTH FOUNDATION$100,000
CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA$83,333
WYOMING VALLEY CHILDRENS ASSOC$500
HARVEYS LAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT$500
VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER$500
CANCER WELLNESS CENTER$350
NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES$350
BLUE CHIP ANIMAL REFUGE$300
COFFEE INCLUSIVE$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PARC CENTER FOR DISABILITIES: $20k → 12%HARVEST HOUSE: $3k → 9%NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES: $350 → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $350 → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $350 → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $350 → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $350 → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $350 → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $350 → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $350 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $500 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $300 → 15%VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER: $200 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$967k · 12 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$967k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
0%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $167k · revenue +5%
  • MU
    MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2018–2022 · $28k · revenue +40%
  • VR
    VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • RC
    RINGLING COLLEGE OF ART
    one grant, 2017 · $33k
  • PI
    PARC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • MU
    MISERCORIDA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

2
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
3
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
4
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
7
Penn State Health Hampden Medical Center

Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…

Health
8
Penn State Health

Penn state health's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people of pennsylvania, and beyond. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and equitable care; educates and trains (continued…

Health
9
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
10
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
11
Geneva College

Geneva college is a christ-centered academic community that provides a comprehensive education to equip students for faithful and fruitful service to god and neighbor.

Education
12
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center

Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Luzerne Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARINE LABORATORY AND AQUARIUM — $500,000 · OtherMARINE LABORATORY AND AQUARIUMIndividual grant recipient — $50,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART — $33,333 · OtherRINGLING COLLEGE OF ART+9 more — $17,600 · OtherGEISINGER HEALTH — $200,000 · HealthGEISINGER HEALTHMAYO CLINIC — $100,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+1 more — $4,500 · HealthCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $166,666 · EducationCULINARY INSTITUTE OF A…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $50,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY — $27,500 · EducationMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY+1 more — $2,000 · EducationPARC INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesVICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER — $4,500 · Human ServicesHARVEST HOUSE INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesTHE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA — $2,450 · Human Services+1 more — $350 · Human ServicesNORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST — $2,300 · EnvironmentTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY — $1,800 · Animals
Other$601,133Health$304,500Education$246,166Human Services$29,800Environment$2,300Animals$1,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGEISINGER HEALTH — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $166,666 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY — $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARC INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER — $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION — $4,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA — $2,450 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST — $2,300 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LUZERNE FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PARC INC
  • Who funds VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds HARVEST HOUSE INC
  • Who funds THE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA
  • Who funds NORTH BRANCH LAND TRUST
  • Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY
  • Who funds GREATER WILKES BARRE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND D/B/A NORTHEAST SIGHT SERVICES
  • Who funds COFFEE INCLUSIVE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Tambur Family FoundationPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Tambur Family Foundation · Benco Family Foundation Fka Cohen Family Charitable Foundation · Maslow Family Foundation Inc · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · Hackett Philanthropies Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc · Allone Charities · The Luzerne Foundation · Wyoming Valley Health & Education Foundation · Benevento and Mayo Foundation · Joseph and Erma Paglianite Charitable Foundation · Allone Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Metz Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Parc Inc2% of income from government
  • Harvest House Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph