Skip to content

· Public charity

Metro Multifamily Housing Association

Multifamily nw is committed to promoting a high degree of professionalism for rental housing providers.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$113k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$404kHealth$49kInternational$38kEmployment$20kEducation$11kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $132,103, the rows itemized in this filing. The $134,751 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,648 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
$112,600
Median grant
1
States reached
$348k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUITABLE HOUSING PAC$112,600
MULTIFAMILY NW FOUNDATION$19,503
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $89k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%NW PILOT PROJECT INC: $20k → 12%NW PILOT PROJECT INC: $17k → 12%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $20k → 9%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $18k → 9%HOUSING INDEPENDENCE: $14k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$330k · 9 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$330k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+59%

Still filing today

89%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT
    2× · 2021–2022 · $37k · revenue +46%
  • CP
    Community Partners For Affordable Housing
    2× · 2021–2022 · $37k · revenue +109%
  • HF
    HOUGH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $36k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • PI
    PARTNERS IN CAREERS
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -15%
  • SHARE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -18%
  • HS
    HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC DBA OUR JUST FUTUREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $14k · revenue +59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
2
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
3
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
4
Opport-Unity

We provide low income housing

Human Services
5
Housing Initiative Partnership Inc

Housing initiative partnership, inc. (hip) develops innovative affordable housing, revitalizes neighborhoods and equips people to achieve their housing and financial goals. hip's vision is that every person lives in high-quality affordable…

Housing & Shelter
6
Housing Options & Planning Enterprises Inc

HOUSING COUNSELING SERVICES - Our Housing Counseling Program supports delivery of a wide variety of housing counseling services to homebuyers, homeowners, and low-to moderate-income renters. The primary objectives of the program are to…

Human Services
7
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
8
Parkview Services

Parkview services creates inclusive housing solutions that promote stability, opportunity, and community.

Human Services
9
Pacific Housing Association
—
10
South Whidbey Homeless Coalition

We provide community members facing homlessness with chelter, resurces, and advoccy to create a strong and thriving widbey island.

Housing & Shelter
11
Places of Change

Resource for housing and other essential needs

Housing & Shelter
12
Housing Affordability Institute
Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in Careers; the most unlike its peers is Great Days Early Education Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EQUITABLE HOUSING PAC: $112,600 · OtherEQUITABLE HOUSING PACHOUGH FOUNDATION: $36,224 · OtherHOUGH FOUNDATIONHOPELIFT: $30,377 · OtherHOPELIFTPARTNERS IN CAREERS: $19,545 · OtherPARTNERS IN CAREERSSHARE: $19,545 · OtherSHAREPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA TRI-STATE CHAPTER: $12,547 · OtherMASONRY BUILDING OWNERS OF OREGON: $10,000 · OtherMULTIFAMILY NW FOUNDATION: $71,232 · Housing & ShelterMULTIFAMILY NW FOUNDATIONCommunity Partners For Affordable Housing: $36,679 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Partners For Affordable Hou…NORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $34,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVESEVOLVE WORK FORCE & MULTIFAMILY HOUSING SERVICES: $34,000 · Housing & ShelterEVOLVE WORK FORCE & MULTIFAMILY HOUSI…SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $38,000 · Human ServicesSHARED HOPE INTERNA…NORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT: $36,887 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST PILOT PRO…HOUSING INDEPENDENCE INC: $14,377 · Human ServicesHOUSING INDEPENDENC…HUMAN SOLUTIONS INC DBA OUR JUST FUTURE: $14,377 · Community ImprovementGreat Days Early Education Center: $11,474 · Education
Other$240,838Housing & Shelter$175,911Human Services$89,264Community Improvement$14,377Education$11,474

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMULTIFAMILY NW FOUNDATION: $71,232 over 4y, 29% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $38,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHWEST PILOT PROJECT: $36,887 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Partners For Affordable Housing: $36,679 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOUGH FOUNDATION: $36,224 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HOUSING ALTERNATIVES: $34,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEVOLVE WORK FORCE & MULTIFAMILY HOUSING SERVICES: $34,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHOPELIFT: $30,377 over 2y, 16% of budgetPARTNERS IN CAREERS: $19,545 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSHARE: $19,545 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN SOLUTIONS INC DBA OUR JUST FUTURE: $14,377 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING INDEPENDENCE INC: $14,377 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA TRI-STATE CHAPTER: $12,547 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGreat Days Early Education Center: $11,474 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR15.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Firstenburg Foundation · Careoregon Inc · United Way of the Columbia-Willamette · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Metro Multifamily Housing Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Metro Multifamily Housing Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Housing Independence Inc: 99% of income from government
  • Community Partners for Affordable Housing: 22% of income from government
  • Human Solutions Inc Dba Our Just Future: 17% of income from government
  • Great Days Early Education Center: 7% of income from government
  • Northwest Pilot Project: 6% of income from government
  • Northwest Housing Alternatives: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Metro Multifamily Housing Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph