Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Messer Construction Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$553k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Health$413kHuman Services$124kArts & Culture$85kEducation$50kEmployment$25kFood & Nutrition$25kYouth Development$25kHousing & Shelter$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $415k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$625k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UC Foundation$150,000
Norton Healthcare Foundation$85,000
Cincinnati Childrens Medical Center$70,000
Americas River Roots Experience$60,000
Ohio Health Foundation$50,000
Wesley House Community Center$25,000
Lexington Hearing Speech Center$25,000
Childrens Home of Northern KY$25,000
Project HOPE Foundation$25,000
University of Louisville Foundation$20,000
Depauw University$10,000
BLOC Ministries$3,750
Habitat for Humanity Johnson County$3,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%Shepherd Community Center: $25k → 16%Project HOPE Foundation: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Messer Construction Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 58% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Messer Construction Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$435k · 3 repeat orgs$577k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$435k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $298k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UC Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $250k
  • NH
    NORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $145k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue -26%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +4%
  • ES
    EasterSeals Servicing Grater Cincinnati
    2× · 2024–2025 · $49k
  • NF
    NASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
10
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Inc

To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Lexington Hearing & Speech Center Inc Dba the Hearing & Speech Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
4/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UC Foundation — $250,000 · OtherUC FoundationCincinnati Childrens Medical Center — $70,000 · OtherCincinnati Childrens Medical CenterAmericas River Roots Experience — $60,000 · OtherAmericas River Roots ExperienceOHIOHEALTH CORPORATION — $50,000 · OtherOHIOHEALTH CORPORATIONEasterSeals Servicing Grater Cincinnati — $49,000 · OtherEasterSeals Servicing Grater CincinnatiLEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC — $25,000 · OtherChildrens Home of Northern KY — $25,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC — $25,000 · OtherWesley House Community Center — $25,000 · OtherSt Elizabeth Health Care Foundation — $22,500 · Other+5 more — $25,000 · OtherNORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $145,000 · HealthNORTON HEALTHCARE FOUND…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $60,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MED…+1 more — $5,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 · EducationDePauw University — $10,000 · EducationPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesShepherd Community Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC — $25,000 · Food & NutritionGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE SOUTHERN PIEDMONT INC — $25,000 · EmploymentSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE — $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$626,500Health$210,000Education$50,000Human Services$50,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Employment$25,000Arts & Culture$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $145,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNASHVILLE FOOD PROJECT INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE SOUTHERN PIEDMONT INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetShepherd Community Inc — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE — $25,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetDePauw University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE RENTER EQUITY INC — $3,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Greater Cincinnati — $3,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF JOHNSON COUNTY — $3,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charities Aid Foundation AmericaVA13.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charities Aid Foundation America · Truist Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Messer Construction Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Messer Construction Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Messer Construction Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph