Skip to content

· Private foundation

Merkin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5.6M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Science & Tech$24MHealth$21MEducation$15MSocial Science$7.5MArts & Culture$1.8MYouth Development$160kInternational$95kHuman Services$90kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $310k
  • $250k+5 grants · $8.8M
$60,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$229M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILKEN INSTITUTE$5,600,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$2,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN DIEGO$500,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$400,000
THE MAVEN PROJECT$300,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA$150,000
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$60,000
LOS ANGELES BALLET$50,000
THE HAROLD & CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION$50,000
KYLES FAMILY FOUNDATION$25,000
THE ANDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION$15,000
UCLA FOUNDATION$10,000
UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$10,000
THE SUGAR RAY LEONARD FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $65k → 10%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $25k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $20k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $20k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
MA
NV
PA
CA
UT
MD
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$65M · 17 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
25

Total granted

$65M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+4%

Still filing today

76%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    The Broad Institute Inc
    5× · 2019–2023 · $17M · revenue +58%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +40%
  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +191%

Funded once

  • FJ
    FALLEN JOURNALISTS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -76%
  • CR
    CONVERGENT RESEARCH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -28%
  • KS
    KECK SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF USC
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
2
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
3
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
4
The Jonsson Cancer Center Foundation

The jonsson cancer center foundation is the single most important vehicle for raising private funds for cancer research at ucla and plays a key role in advancing cancer treatments and care. please see schedule o for additional information.

—
5
The California Medical Innovations Institute Inc

The Institute is a scientific research center dedicated to conducting basic and applied research to advance the understanding of human disease and the improvement of human health. The Institute fosters an innovative research environment…

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
8
La Jolla Institute for Immunology

At la jolla institute for immunology, our scientists focus on understanding how the immune system works in order to promote human health and prevent disease. our discoveries apply to many diseases, ranging from diabetes to heart disease,…

—
9
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

The parker institute for cancer immunotherapy's (pici) mission is to accelerate the development of breakthrough immune therapies to turn all cancers into curable diseases.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ucla Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Why Not Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $21,610,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $8,000,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY+2 more: $260,000 · EducationThe Broad Institute Inc: $17,250,000 · HealthThe Broad Institute Inc+4 more: $815,000 · HealthTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $7,500,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTEWESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERSITY: $2,000,000 · OtherWESTERN GOVERNORS UNIVERS…WGU Advancement: $2,000,000 · OtherWGU AdvancementUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - SAN DIEGO: $1,500,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA …+20 more: $2,600,000 · Other+20 morePROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,175,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $93,000 · PhilanthropyCONVERGENT RESEARCH INC: $1,000,000 · Science & TechBIOSCIENCE LOS ANGELES COUNTY INC: $500,000 · Science & TechFALLEN JOURNALISTS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · Civil RightsMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $600,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $200,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $25,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$29,870,000Health$18,065,000Other$15,600,000Philanthropy$2,268,000Science & Tech$1,500,000Civil Rights$1,000,000Arts & Culture$825,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $21,610,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $17,250,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $8,000,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $7,500,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,175,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetWGU Advancement: $2,000,000 over 2y, 89% of budgetFALLEN JOURNALISTS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetCONVERGENT RESEARCH INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE MAVEN PROJECT: $600,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES: $600,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIOSCIENCE LOS ANGELES COUNTY INC: $500,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetX PRIZE FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES BALLET INC: $200,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION): $200,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $85,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $65,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKyles Family Foundation: $60,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKERSHAW'S CHALLENGE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWHY NOT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetANDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUGAR RAY LEONARD FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Andre Reed Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds The Broad Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE MILKEN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WGU Advancement ↗
  • Who funds FALLEN JOURNALISTS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONVERGENT RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAVEN PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds BIOSCIENCE LOS ANGELES COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds X PRIZE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Kyles Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KERSHAW'S CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR COLLEGE-READY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds WHY NOT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANDERSON FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA15× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Merkin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Merkin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 19%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Merkin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Merkin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Merkin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph