· Public charity
Meridian International Center
MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER empowers the next era of diplomacy for a better future.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $1,491,161 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,710,470 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $219,309 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $129k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $1.0M
- $250k+1 grant · $332k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR INTERNATIONAL UNDERSTANDING THROUGH STUDENTS | $331,651 |
| NORTHERN NEVADA INTERNATIONAL CENTER | $216,358 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST | $194,026 |
| DIALOGUE INSTITUTE | $194,004 |
| GLOBAL TIES KC | $162,482 |
| VERMONT COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAIRS | $136,752 |
| ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE US INC | $65,254 |
| BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY | $54,922 |
| SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY | $37,082 |
| WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF KENTUCKY | $36,150 |
| ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY | $32,680 |
| TRUMAN CENTER FOR NATIONAL POLICY | $23,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL | $6,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $219k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 9 regions, $12k to organizations and $207k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: SYMPOSIUM ON STRATEGIC SUBNATIONAL DIPLOMACY · PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
Stated purpose: PARTICIPANT SUPPORT GRANTS
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFoundation for International Understanding Through6× · 2019–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +14% · 50% of their budget
- NNNORTHERN NEVADA INTERNATIONAL CENTER8× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +320%
- GTGLOBAL TIES KC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $762k · revenue +246%
Funded once
- GCGEORGIA COUNCIL FOR INTERTNATIONALgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $83k · revenue +172%
- WWORLDCHICAGOone grant, 2019 · $30k
- VHVCUVCU HEALTH CAMPUSone grant, 2017 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cultural exchange and home hospitality.
Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.
To promote the widest possible understanding of world affairs among the citizens of New Hampshire.
The World Affairs Council, a 501(c)3 nonprofit, is the bridge that connects the world to one of America's most vibrant regions. Through Global education, International exchange, and cultural awareness initiatives, the council strengthens…
The International Center is a District of Columbia 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization founded in 1977, has as its principal purpose the promotion of greater international understanding and the lessening of international frictions and…
Boulder Council for International Visitors is a volunteer organization that is a local host organization that arranges local meetings with professionals, politicians, educators, artists and social events for up-and-coming leaders from…
Education, non-partisan, membership organization that encourages people and organizations in the region to take an interest in, to learn more about, and to participate to a greater extent in global matters.
The International Relations Council strengthens Kansas Citys global perspective by maintaining an active dialogue around world events global issues and their impact on our community. As a nonpartisan educational nonprofit organization the…
Implement international visitor programs to promote global understanding through professional development and cultural exchange.
The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.
To provide opportunities for foreign diplomats and Americans to share ideas and foster understanding of their respective countries' instutions, policies and cultures.
Global ties iowa coordinates people-to-people exchanges between international leaders and residents of eastern iowa's creative corridor.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Affairs Council and the most unlike its peers is University of Notre Dame du Lac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Foundation for International Understanding Through ↗
- Who funds DIALOGUE INSTITUTE DBA JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA INTERNATIONAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL TIES KC INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAIRS INC ↗
- Who funds World Affairs Council of Oregon dba WorldOregon ↗
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds DENVER WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL DBA WORLDDE ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL VISITORS COUNCIL OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds International Visitors Center of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Global Ties Alabama ↗
- Who funds SAN DIEGO DIPLOMACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds Arkansas Council for International Visitors ↗
- Who funds TEXAS INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds ENTREPRENEURS ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds MIAMI COUNCIL FOR INTERNATIONAL VISITORS INC ↗
- Who funds PRESIDENTIAL PRECINCT ↗
- Who funds WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL OF DALLAS/FORT WORTH ↗
- Who funds The Albuquerque Council for International Visitors ↗
- Who funds World Affairs Council of Kentucky S ↗
- Who funds International Visitors Utah Council ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOCUS INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds CLEVELAND COUNCIL ON WORLD AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds International House of Metrolina Inc ↗
- Who funds GlobalPittsburgh ↗
- Who funds Atlas Service Corps Inc ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA COUNCIL FOR INTERTNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds 3 DAY STARTUP INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Global Ties US · World Learning Inc · Georgetown University · International Visitors Center of Chicago · The Aspen Institute Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Meridian International Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Affairs Council of Oregon dba WorldOregon — 0% of income from government
- Vermont Council On World Affairs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.