How much did MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS grant in FY2025?

MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS reported 3 grants totaling $124,165 in its FY2025 IRS filing.

Where is MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS based?

MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS is based in TX.

MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS

Providing education, advocacy and connection to create a unified voice for nutrition providers that improves the lives of older texans and individuals with disabilities.

$124k

Granted FY2025

Grants

Communities

$41k

Largest

01What you fund

0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2025.

Human Services$238kFood & Nutrition$34kReligion$5kOther$96k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

—

2021

disaster reliefrelief censuscensus minimeeting disasterambassador

2024

addressing foodfood insecurityinsecurity socialsocial isolationisolation behavioralbehavioral health

2025

addressing foodfood insecurityinsecurity socialsocial isolationisolation behavioralbehavioral health

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$30,460

Median grant

States reached

$130k

Total assets

Largest grants

NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS$41,460
MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC$30,460
SENIOR CENTER OF WALKER COUNTY$30,460

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 57% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$161k · 6 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$161k

$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+75%

Still filing today

100%

86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NS
NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS
2× · 2021–2025 · $47k · revenue +11%
SC
SENIOR CENTER OF WALKER COUNTY
2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +35%
MO
MEALS ON WHEELS NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS INC
2× · 2024–2025 · $40k · revenue +59%

Funded once

MO
MEALS ON WHEELS SAN ANTONIOgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $45k · revenue +153%
WB
WILLIAMSON BURNET COUNTY OPPORTUNITIES
one grant, 2020 · $33k · revenue +24%
OC
ORANGE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2018 · $32k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Meals On Wheels and More Inc

Helping nearly 5,000 older adults in central texas live independenty so they can age in place in their homes.

Food & Nutrition

Somervell County Committee On Aging

To serve the elderly of somervell county, tx providing information on aging and assisting family and friends who care for older citizens, with emphasis on minority and low income persons.

Human Services

Houston County Council On Aging Inc

The organization's primary mission is to provide nutritious meals to eligible persons allowing them to maintain their independence.

Human Services

Fort Bend Seniors Meals on Wheels and

FBS is committed to helping seniors remain independent through services and resources.

Human Services

Gonzales County Senior Citizens Association Inc

Provide home delivered meals and transportation services free of charge.

Food & Nutrition

Senior Citizen Services of North Texas

Senior citizens services of north texas, inc. has been feeding the hungry in wichita county for more than 58 years. meals on wheels wichita county provides delicious, wholesome meals through six outreach programs in the community,…

Human Services

Meals On Wheels Inc

Provide meal delivery service to seniors and adult day program participants.

Food & Nutrition

Meals On Wheels Waco

Meals on wheels waco nourishes the bodies, minds, and spirits of older adults in the heart of texas through meals, transportation, activities, and volunteer support.

Human Services

Muleshoe Meals On Wheels Inc

The Muleshoe Meals on Wheels purpose is to engage in all activities necessary, useful, or expedient, through operative measures and active organizations, to promote and further the interests of the Senior citizens of the area. The purpose…

—

Meals On Wheels Montgomery County

Home-delivered meals & transportation for the homebound elderly of montgomery county, tx

—

Dillon County Council On Aging

Provides senior center and congregate and home delivered meals, homemaker services allowing seniors to remain in their homes.

Human Services

Dawson County Senior Citizens Center Inc

Provide meals on wheels, congregate meals, and recreational facility for elderly and low income persons of dawson county texas.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels South Texas and the most unlike its peers is Rainbow Senior Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

17/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$238,027Other$95,904Food & Nutrition$33,967Religion$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Meals on Wheels AmericaVA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Meals on Wheels America · Isla Carroll Turner Friendship Trust · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson · Texas Mutual Insurance Company · Wellmed Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SENIOR CENTER OF WALKER COUNTY.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 760057647 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SENIOR CENTER OF WALKER COUNTY, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Meals on Wheels Texas?

Find your warmest path to Meals on Wheels Texas through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Meals on Wheels Texas?

More from the funding graph

MEALS ON WHEELS TEXAS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Meals on Wheels Texas?

More from the funding graph