Skip to content

· Private foundation

MCS Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.4M
Granted FY2023
44
Grants FY2023
12
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$3.7MHuman Services$1.8MEducation$1.7MArts & Culture$841kPublic Safety & Disaster$462kFood & Nutrition$445kReligion$367kPublic Benefit$240kOther$0
02FY2023 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 44 grants below total $4,847,050, the rows itemized in this filing. The $5,401,050 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $554,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k9 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
$71,127
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE & SPCA$700,000
BEAVER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$555,000
100 CLUB OF ARIZONA$425,000
CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY$350,000
CHAMPION LIFE CHURCH$250,000
EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION (K-LOVE)$210,000
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$205,000
MILLCREEK RETIREMENT HOME FOR HORSES$200,000
HUNKAPI PROGRAMS$197,000
VETERANS HEALING FARM$175,000
MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY$135,563
SAM CENTER (SERVING AREA MILITARY)$112,000
SAN ANTONIO PETS ALIVE$100,000
BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$100,000
ALMOST THERE: A MOM+PUPS RESCUE$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOILDERS BEST FRIEND: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
OH
PA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 28 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
22

Total granted

$7.0M
$387k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+19%

Still filing today

68%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEducationReligionPublic BenefitHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $830k · revenue +50%
  • BC
    BEAVER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2022–2023 · $630k · revenue +47%
  • HH
    HALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $505k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • JF
    JUMET FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $75k
  • FH
    FISHER HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +64%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ARIZONA FISHER HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
2
Humane Society of Yuma

To reduce the number of homeless pets through adoption, rescue and spay and neuter programs.

Animals
3
Humane Animal Partners

Founded in 2023, humane animal partners is a nonprofit no-kill animal care and adoption center. we are committed to providing for the needs of homeless and owned dogs and cats in our community. we make "friends for life" by connecting…

Animals
4
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
5
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
6
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
7
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
8
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
9
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
10
Shelter From the Storm Animal Rescue Inc

Reduce the euthanasia rate of healthy and adoptable animals and improve the lives of companion animals by finding permanent homes for animals in need, providing support to communities who do not have access to humane organizations,…

—
11
Humane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter

Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…

Animals
12
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Jumet Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
36/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAMC FISHER HOUSE: $600,000 · OtherBAMC FISHER HOUSEJAN JUMET FOUNDATION: $461,000 · OtherJAN JUMET FOUNDATION100 CLUB OF ARIZONA: $425,000 · Other100 CLUB OF ARIZONAFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCCHAMPION LIFE CHURCH INC: $260,000 · OtherCHAMPION LIFE CHURCH INCMILLCREEK RETIREMENT HOME FOR HORSES: $200,000 · OtherENGLEWOOD ANIMAL RESCUE SOCIETY (EARS): $194,000 · Other+45 more: $1,561,993 · Other+45 moreTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $830,000 · AnimalsTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUEHAVE A GREAT SPAY: $669,000 · AnimalsHAVE A GREAT SPAYHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC: $505,000 · AnimalsHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INCArizona Humane Society: $275,000 · AnimalsArizona Humane SocietyRetirement Home For Horses Inc: $135,000 · AnimalsBEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $110,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $110,000 · Animals+7 more: $392,400 · Animals+7 moreBEAVER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $630,000 · EducationBEAVER COUNTY CHRIS…Texas A&M Foundation: $450,000 · EducationTexas A&M Foundatio…CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $350,000 · EducationCHICAGO HOPE ACADEM…Midwestern University: $163,563 · EducationMidwestern Universi…JUMET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationJUMET CHARITABLE FO…+1 more: $50,000 · EducationPACKAGES FROM HOME: $460,000 · PhilanthropyVeterans Healing Farm: $175,000 · Public BenefitHONOR FLIGHT NORTHERN ARIZONA: $55,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $5,000 · Public BenefitEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Arts & CultureNEIGHBORHOOD NORTH MUSEUM OF PLAY: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureHUNKAPI PROGRAMS INC: $197,000 · HealthSCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · Health
Other$4,101,993Animals$3,026,400Education$1,743,563Philanthropy$460,000Public Benefit$235,000Arts & Culture$230,000Health$212,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE: $830,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetHAVE A GREAT SPAY: $669,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetBEAVER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $630,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC: $505,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetPACKAGES FROM HOME: $460,000 over 7y, 8.7% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $450,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budget100 CLUB OF ARIZONA: $425,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $350,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $275,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUNKAPI PROGRAMS INC: $197,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetVeterans Healing Farm: $175,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetMidwestern University: $163,563 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRetirement Home For Horses Inc: $135,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetBEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $110,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $110,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $110,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSan Antonio Pets Alive Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT): $100,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJUMET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetALMOST THERE A MOM PUPS RESCUE: $100,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT NORTHERN ARIZONA: $55,000 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetKindred Spirits Rescue Ranch: $47,400 over 2y, 20% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CLARK COUNTY: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD NORTH MUSEUM OF PLAY: $15,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOLDIERS BEST FRIEND: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAGS & BLESSINGS: $5,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCarnegie Free Library of Beaver Falls: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHomeless Youth Connection Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE BEAVER LIONS CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNALTERED MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVets Helping Heroes Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ARIZONA ANIMAL WELFARE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds HAVE A GREAT SPAY ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds HALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC ↗
  • Who funds PACKAGES FROM HOME ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds 100 CLUB OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUNKAPI PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Healing Farm ↗
  • Who funds Midwestern University ↗
  • Who funds Retirement Home For Horses Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEAVER COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Pets Alive Inc ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds JUMET CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALMOST THERE A MOM PUPS RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds HONOR FLIGHT NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ19.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · American Express Foundation · Petsmart Charities Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · BHHS Legacy Foundation · Petco Love · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Louis J & Millie Matcek Kocurek Charitable · Cb and Anita Branch Trust James L Drought Trustee · Mc Companies - Sharing the Good Life Foundation · John F Long Foundation Inc · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization MCS Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from MCS Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to MCS Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to MCS Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $3.6M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on MCS’ filings →

    More from the funding graph