Skip to content

· Private foundation

McPherson Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Arts & Culture$12kReligion$4kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$600Environment$300Education$200Housing & Shelter$200Other$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$200
Median grant
3
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
WITTE MUSEUM$250
AMERICAN RED CROSS$200
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$200
SALVATION ARMY$200
ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION$100
SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY$35
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%BOYSVILLE: $650 → 16%BOYSVILLE: $500 → 16%BOYSVILLE: $400 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28k · 11 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$28k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+71%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BOYSVILLE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +41%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +125%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $300 · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • AH
    ALAMO HEIGHTS METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $200
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $200
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
3
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
6
New Orleans Museum of Art

The mission of the new orleans museum of art is to inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge and engage a diverse public.

Arts & Culture
7
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
8
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
9
San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association

To collect and preserve significant historical materials that relate to the early history and culture of Texas and to promote the study of the history of Texas through exhibits, publications, and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
10
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
San Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc

To develop the resources to support san antonio regional hospital's mission to improve the health and wellbeing of the people we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Witte Museum; the most unlike its peers is Boysville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $7,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY: $1,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $600 · Other+6 more: $1,035 · Other+6 moreWitte Museum: $11,480 · Arts & CultureWitte Museum+1 more: $325 · Arts & CultureBOYSVILLE INC: $1,550 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $300 · EnvironmentALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $200 · Education
Other$16,235Arts & Culture$11,805Human Services$1,550Health$1,550Environment$300Education$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWitte Museum: $11,480 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC: $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM: $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSA CANCER COUNCIL: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SA CANCER COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McPherson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McPherson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McPherson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph