Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

McPherson Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2020
8
Grants FY2020
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Arts & Culture$12kReligion$4kHuman Services$3kHealth$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$600Environment$300Education$200Housing & Shelter$200Other$0
02FY2020 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$200
Median grant
3
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
WITTE MUSEUM$250
AMERICAN RED CROSS$200
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$200
SALVATION ARMY$200
ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION$100
SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY$35
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%BOYSVILLE: $650 → 16%BOYSVILLE: $500 → 16%BOYSVILLE: $400 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$28k · 11 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$28k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+71%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BOYSVILLE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +41%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +125%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $300 · revenue +93%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • AH
    ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $200 · revenue +71%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $200

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
3
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
6
New Orleans Museum of Art

The mission of the new orleans museum of art is to inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge and engage a diverse public.

Arts & Culture
7
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
8
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
9
San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association

To collect and preserve significant historical materials that relate to the early history and culture of Texas and to promote the study of the history of Texas through exhibits, publications, and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
10
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

11
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
12
San Antonio Hospital Foundation Inc

To develop the resources to support san antonio regional hospital's mission to improve the health and wellbeing of the people we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Witte Museum and the most unlike its peers is Boysville Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $7,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $4,000 · OtherST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY — $1,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS — $600 · Other+6 more — $1,035 · Other+6 moreWitte Museum — $11,480 · Arts & CultureWitte Museum+1 more — $325 · Arts & CultureBOYSVILLE INC — $1,550 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 · Health+1 more — $50 · HealthNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $300 · EnvironmentALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $200 · Education
Other$16,235Arts & Culture$11,805Human Services$1,550Health$1,550Environment$300Education$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWitte Museum — $11,480 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC — $1,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM — $325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSA CANCER COUNCIL — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Witte Museum
  • Who funds BOYSVILLE INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds SA CANCER COUNCIL
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ALAMO HEIGHTS SCHOOL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO CONSERVATION SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McPherson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph