Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

McLaughlin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$987kInternational$132kHealth$84kCivil Rights$11kHousing & Shelter$1kFood & Nutrition$437Arts & Culture$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$24k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REJOICE PROJECT$12,000
BUFORD GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH$12,000
INDIAN MINISTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA$12,000
MERCY WORKS MINISTRIES$6,000
FRONTLINE FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL$5,000
VOICE OF MARTYRS$3,000
SCORE INTERNATIONAL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
SIBLEY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH$1,200
HOPE MEDIA GROUP$1,200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TRANS RUSSIA MISSIONS: $10k → 12%TRANS RUSSIA MISSIONS: $10k → 12%TRANS RUSSIA MISSIONS: $10k → 12%TRANS RUSSIA MISSIONS: $10k → 12%TRANS RUSSIA MISSIONS: $10k → 12%FRONTLINE FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 12%TRANS RUSSIA MISSIONS: $5k → 12%FRONTLINE FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 12%TRANS RUSSIA MISSIONS: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WI
MI
NY
NJ
CO
MO
WV
AZ
TN
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 36 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$14k

Still filing today

39%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GLOBAL HOPE MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $169k · revenue +54%
  • PR
    PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF PANAMA CITY INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $84k · revenue +150%
  • RP
    Rejoice Project Inc formerly known as Choose to Invest Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $84k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • MC
    MERCY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • NC
    NORTHGATE CENTRE FOR GLOBAL IMPACT
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
2
Waymaker International Ministries

WayMaker International Ministries is an inter-denominational mission organization committed to leading Christians in sharing Jesus Christ with the world, encouraging believers, and ministering to the international community.

Religion
3
Rejoice Ministries International

RMI provides pastoral care ministry and support globally, with conferences, seminars, retreats, meetings and individual counseling.

Civil Rights
4
Reconciliation Ministries International Inc

Reconciliaton Ministries Intl. is a Christian evangelical organization preaching and teaching the Word of God in over 60 countries. The ministry equips and encourages Christians everywhere to be saved, healed, and delivered according to…

Religion
5
King Ministries International

To spread the Gospel of Jesus the Christ

Religion
6
Hal Lindsey Website Ministries

Teaching and Spreading the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
7
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
8
Face to Faith Ministry

Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…

Religion
9
Jesus Ministries International

Promote christian religion through conferences and group meetings.

Religion
10
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
11
Keith Wheeler Ministries Inc

Spread the gospel of jesus christ

Religion
12
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Word of Life Fellowship Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rejoice Project Inc formerly known as Choose to Invest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%38%10–20yr16%42%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
1/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES INC — $116,200 · OtherLIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES INCBUFORD GROVE BAPTIST CHURCH — $113,550 · OtherBUFORD GROVE BAPTIST CHURCHMERCY WORKS MINISTRIES — $48,000 · OtherMERCY WORKS MINISTRIESSIBLEY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH — $43,300 · OtherSIBLEY MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCHEZRA INTERNATIONAL — $42,000 · OtherEZRA INTERNATIONALCENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH — $34,500 · OtherCENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCHREJOICE PROJECT — $24,000 · OtherVOICE OF EVANGELISM OUTREACH MINISTRIES — $23,750 · Other+26 more — $180,128 · Other+26 moreGLOBAL HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $169,000 · ReligionGLOBAL HOPE MINISTRIES INCINDIAN MINISTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $108,000 · ReligionINDIAN MINISTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA…NORTHSTAR CHURCH INC — $51,500 · ReligionNORTHSTAR CHURCH INCSCORE INTERNATIONAL INC — $17,300 · ReligionShalom Ministries Internationa — $16,500 · Religion+3 more — $19,923 · ReligionPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF PANAMA CITY INC — $84,000 · HealthRejoice Project Inc formerly known as Choose to Invest Inc — $84,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRONTLINE FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL INC — $69,700 · Human ServicesHOPE MEDIA GROUP — $1,200 · Arts & CultureFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC — $874 · International
Other$625,428Religion$382,223Health$84,000Youth Development$84,000Human Services$69,700Arts & Culture$1,200International$874

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL HOPE MINISTRIES INC — $169,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetINDIAN MINISTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $108,000 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF PANAMA CITY INC — $84,000 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetRejoice Project Inc formerly known as Choose to Invest Inc — $84,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetFRONTLINE FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL INC — $69,700 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetNORTHSTAR CHURCH INC — $51,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEZRA INTERNATIONAL — $42,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetSCORE INTERNATIONAL INC — $17,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetShalom Ministries Internationa — $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC — $10,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFishermen for Jesus Ministries — $9,600 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetHOPE OF THE WORLD — $7,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA — $2,223 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE MEDIA GROUP — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIGHT WAY MINISTRIES USA INC — $1,100 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC — $874 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBAL HOPE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds INDIAN MINISTRIES OF NORTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER OF PANAMA CITY INC
  • Who funds Rejoice Project Inc formerly known as Choose to Invest Inc
  • Who funds FRONTLINE FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR CHURCH INC
  • Who funds EZRA INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds SCORE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds Shalom Ministries Internationa
  • Who funds WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC
  • Who funds Fishermen for Jesus Ministries
  • Who funds HOPE OF THE WORLD
  • Who funds DAYSTAR BAPTIST MISSIONS INC
  • Who funds INTENTIONAL LIFE MEDIA
  • Who funds HOPE MEDIA GROUP
  • Who funds RIGHT WAY MINISTRIES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McLaughlin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Northstar Church Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph