Skip to content

· Private foundation

McKean Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$82k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$279kReligion$218kHealth$32kYouth Development$13kPublic Benefit$7kArts & Culture$6kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $82k
$180
Median grant
9
States reached
$78k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD OF LAKE WORTH$81,627
MILITARY AFFAIRS COUNCIL INC$3,500
THE CHABAD HOUSE OF PALM BEACH$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI$1,950
BNAI VAIL CONGREGATION$1,291
TN RECORDING ARTISTS EDUCATION ALLI$1,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$500
Baptist Health South Florida Founda$380
Congregation Beth Tefillah$360
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$200
CHABAD OF WEST BOYNTON$180
Chabad at University of Miami$180
CHABAD OF WEST DELRAY$180
NICKLAUS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$179
STARTING HEARTS$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $880) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI: $500 → 15%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI: $280 → 15%VAIL VALLEY CHARITABLE FUND: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$564k · 37 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
40

Total granted

$564k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

43%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $865 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Miami
    6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +66%
  • HD
    HOMESTEAD-SOUTH DADE KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $13k · revenue +46%
  • NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • HH
    HEALING HEARTS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • MC
    MARINE CORE LEAGUE
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • C
    CHABADORG
    one grant, 2022 · $337
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
5
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
6
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Nathans Passion Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Miami: $274,820 · EducationUniversity of MiamiHOMESTEAD-SOUTH DADE KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · Education+2 more: $950 · EducationCHABAD OF EAST LAKE WORTH GREENACRES AND ATLANTIS INC: $120,875 · OtherCHABAD OF EAST LAKE WORTH GREENACRES AND ATLANTIS INCCHABAD OF WEST DELRAY: $53,610 · OtherCHABAD OF WEST DELRAYNICKLAUS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,229 · OtherNICKLAUS HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE CHABAD HOUSE OF PALM BEACH: $21,026 · OtherTHE CHABAD HOUSE OF PALM BEACH+61 more: $50,455 · Other+61 moreMILITARY AFFAIRS COUNCIL INC: $6,500 · Public BenefitStarting Hearts: $1,050 · HealthBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $380 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $237 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $100 · HealthMARGAUX'S MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Health+2 more: $65 · HealthNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $1,442 · EnvironmentSARARA INSTITUTE: $53 · EnvironmentGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $1,200 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $50 · PhilanthropyFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI INC: $780 · Human ServicesVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc: $100 · Human Services
Education$288,270Other$271,195Public Benefit$6,500Health$2,232Environment$1,495Philanthropy$1,250Human Services$880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Miami: $274,820 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOMESTEAD-SOUTH DADE KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetMILITARY AFFAIRS COUNCIL INC: $6,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $1,442 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStarting Hearts: $1,050 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HOSPITAL ART INC: $950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI INC: $780 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $616 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $380 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $237 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $180 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVail Valley Charitable Fund Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARGAUX'S MIRACLE FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCASA VALENTINA INC: $85 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARARA INSTITUTE: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNathans Passion Project: $50 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITS GOOD TO KNOW: $5 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Miami ↗
  • Who funds HOMESTEAD-SOUTH DADE KIWANIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY AFFAIRS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Starting Hearts ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR HOSPITAL ART INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Miami Jewish Federation IncFL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Miami Jewish Federation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McKean Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McKean Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McKean Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph