Skip to content

· Public charity

McGuinn Homes Foundation

By using business as a catalyst for ministry, we partner with organizations to create sustainable growth and lasting impact.

$588k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$215kHuman Services$152kArts & Culture$110kReligion$99kPhilanthropy$90kEducation$85kRecreation & Sports$50kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $222,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $587,924 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $365,924 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$30,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$762k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEA PLACE$50,000
ORIGINAL DESIGN$50,000
GOOD SAMARITAN AUTO CARE$42,000
FRIENDS FOR HEALTH IN HAITI$30,000
MISSION INCREASE$25,000
YOUNG LIFE LEXINGTON COUNTY$10,000
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP$10,000
GRAND ANSE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT GAHDA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CITY LIGHTS: $25k → 13%CITY LIGHTS: $20k → 13%CITY LIGHTS: $18k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MA
OR
UT
CO
MO
NC
SC
TX

Grants abroad, by region: $203k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Haiti$203k · 100% · 66 people

Stated purpose: HOUSING · EDUCATION SUPPLIES, TUTORS, STIPENDS, TUITION TO SCHOOL · BASIC MEDICAL EXPENSES

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 7 repeat orgs$359k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$462k
$274k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+67%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Friends for Health in Haiti Inc
    4× · 2020–2025 · $66k · revenue +69%
  • GS
    Good Samaritan Auto Care
    2× · 2024–2025 · $64k · revenue +22%
  • CITY LIGHTS MINISTRY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $63k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • DA
    Development Assoc International
    one grant, 2023 · $101k · revenue -3%
  • UH
    UKRAINIAN HUB INC
    one grant, 2024 · $89k
  • JR
    JEREMIE RISINGgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $85k · revenue +67% · 43% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Good Shepherd Ministries

Operates and maintains three Christian schools in Haiti providing education, healthcare, and discipleship for nearly 1600 Haitian children

International
2
Kingdom Investment International Inc

Kingdom Investment works among the poor and oppressed to bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God that results in holistic transformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Religion
3
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
4
Sea of Hope Ministries

To present the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Religion
5
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
6
Global Effect Ministries

Global Effect Ministries teaches principles to build healthy families and strong marriages in developing nations. We care for orphans, widows, and people in need by developing nationals, empower impoverished individuals to find ways to…

International
7
Gospel Systems

Gospel Systems Inc. organizes and facilitates programs for developing and supporting leaders in Haiti and Southeast Asia, and establishes programs for the care of the poor and vulnerable through indigenous organizations.

International
8
Joshua International Ministries

Joshua International Ministries is a Christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children and families to overcome poverty and reach their maximum potential by providing free educational and medical services in Sierra…

Religion
9
World of God Inc

World of God is founded to sponsor children living in extreme poverty who are not being reached by other international child sponsorship organizations. We are operating at present in Bayonnais, Haiti.

Human Services
10
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
11
Global Vision Citadelle Ministries Inc

Global Vision Citadelle Ministries is on a mission to bring the hope and light of Christ TO THEIR NATION. We do this by empowering our network of 60 local Haitian churches with spiritual and practical assistance, impacting communities with…

International
12
Manna Mission Inc

Christian Based Hospital/Church

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Development Assoc International; the most unlike its peers is Sea Place Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEREMIE RISING: $110,155 · OtherJEREMIE RISINGUKRAINIAN HUB INC: $88,600 · OtherUKRAINIAN HUB INCGRANDANSE HEALTH & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $48,300 · OtherGRANDANSE HEALTH & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIA…YOUNG LIFE: $20,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFECHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC: $10,000 · OtherDevelopment Assoc International: $101,020 · ReligionDevelopment Assoc Inte…Good Samaritan Auto Care: $64,000 · ReligionGood Samaritan Auto Ca…SEA PLACE INC: $90,472 · PhilanthropySEA PLACE INCMISSION INCREASE: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMISSION INCREAS…JEREMIE RISING: $84,658 · EducationJEREMIE RIS…Friends for Health in Haiti Inc: $66,000 · InternationalFriends f…CITY LIGHTS MINISTRY: $63,075 · Human ServicesORIGINAL DESIGN: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$277,055Religion$165,020Philanthropy$115,472Education$84,658International$66,000Human Services$63,075Recreation & Sports$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDevelopment Assoc International: $101,020 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSEA PLACE INC: $90,472 over 3y, 45% of budgetJEREMIE RISING: $84,658 over 1y, 43% of budgetFriends for Health in Haiti Inc: $66,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetGood Samaritan Auto Care: $64,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCITY LIGHTS MINISTRY: $63,075 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetORIGINAL DESIGN: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetGRANDANSE HEALTH & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $48,300 over 3y, 31% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McGuinn Homes Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McGuinn Homes Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McGuinn Homes Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McGuinn Homes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McGuinn Homes’ filings →

    More from the funding graph