Skip to content

· Private foundation

McFadin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$593kRecreation & Sports$65kEducation$57kHuman Services$52kReligion$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$347k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MD ANDERSON HOSPITAL$20,000
UT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$20,000
CANCER THERAPY AND RESEARCH$15,000
HISPANIC SPORTS FOUNDATION$15,000
AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK$5,000
DR SEMMES FAMILY YMCA$2,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$2,000
SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $10k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $5k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $3k → 16%RESPITE CARE OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$740k · 13 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +65% since the first grant, against -6% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$740k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
-6%

Still filing today

23%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO SPORTS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $50k · revenue +24%
  • RF
    REY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +271% · 55% of their budget
  • 3T
    3 THE HARDEN WAY INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $8k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • SF
    SUPPORT FOR LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • HS
    Hispanic Sports Foundation For Education Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $7k · revenue -39%
  • GS
    GIRL SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
2
San Antonio Patriots

San Antonio Patriots goal is to provide high quality, school athletic programs that are Christ honoring for our homeschool students.

Recreation & Sports
3
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
4
San Francisco High School of the Arts

San Francisco Arts and Science Academy (ASA) provides TK5 grade students with a strong foundation in the arts, language, math, and science, fostering creativity, curiosity, and character development. Our bilingual, hands-on curriculum…

Education
5
Sabinal Alumni

Scholarships for the graduates of Sabinal High School.

Education
6
Southwest Winners Foundation Inc

The mission of Southwest Winners Foundation is to provide an adaptive and effective learning environment that prepares students for success in the workplace and/or college.

Education
7
San Diego School of Football

Education of Athletes

—
8
Futuro San Antonio

Futuro San Antonio mobilizes families to organize and advocate for education equity by engaging voters, building organizing capacity, and endorsing educational champions. See Schedule O

Public Benefit
9
Aseltine School

Special education school for students with learning disabilities, emotional disturbances, autism, intellectual disabilities (mild to moderate) and other health impairments.

Education
10
San Antonio Education Fund Dba San Antonio Education Partnership

The partnership empowers students with quality educational programs, resources and counseling that will make them confident, knowledgeable and help them finish college and contribute to san antonio's future, making the students san…

Education
11
Riverwalk Education Foundation Inc

Our mission drives academic and socio-emotional development (see Schedule O) through a rigorous college preparatory, STEM-based learning model. The model is anchored on 21st century skills, embraced by a character-building approach, and…

Education
12
Manny and Pat Pulido Sanchez Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Sports Foundation; the most unlike its peers is 3 the Harden Way Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MD ANDERSON HOSPITAL: $194,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON HOSPITALUT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $193,000 · OtherUT HEALTH SCIENCE CENTERCANCER THERAPY AND RESEARCH: $188,000 · OtherCANCER THERAPY AND RESEARCHSAN ANTONIO SPORTS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO SPORTS FOUNDATION+14 more: $120,000 · Other+14 moreREY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationHispanic Sports Foundation For Education Inc: $6,500 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $17,500 · Human ServicesRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesSan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc: $3,500 · Philanthropy
Other$745,000Education$34,500Human Services$20,500Philanthropy$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO SPORTS FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetREY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 55% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget3 THE HARDEN WAY INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHispanic Sports Foundation For Education Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetAUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REY FEO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds 3 THE HARDEN WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Hispanic Sports Foundation For Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harvey E Najim Charitable FoundationTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · San Antonio Area Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Mays Family Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Nustar Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McFadin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McFadin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McFadin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph