Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

McDowell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$212k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.1MEducation$733kFood & Nutrition$165kHealth$147kArts & Culture$80kAnimals$24kRecreation & Sports$21kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 18 grants below total $185,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $211,900 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $26,400 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $105k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Taft School$105,000
Duke University$36,950
Community Foundation of Western North Carolina$5,000
The Sato Project$5,000
Jewish Museum$5,000
Daniel W. Offit Fund to Fight Glioblastoma$5,000
National Breast Cancer Coalition$5,000
World Monument Fund$5,000
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Society$2,500
BGCNW$2,000
St. Theresa's Roman Catholic Church$1,800
North American Gamebird Foundation$1,500
Bedford Playhouse$1,000
One Tree Planted Inc$1,000
Gucker Campership Fund$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 12 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +105% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$1.0M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+6%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $394k · revenue +44%
  • TT
    THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION
    4× · 2019–2024 · $309k · revenue +107%
  • SHELBURNE FARMS
    3× · 2019–2023 · $165k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • WM
    Winifred Masterson Burke Medical Researchgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +28%
  • NH
    Northwell Health Fdtn
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • PF
    Physicians for Human Rigts
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Rockefeller University

The rockefeller university (the university) is a world renowned center for research and graduate education in the biomedical sciences, chemistry, bioinformatics, and physics. the university's 73 laboratories conduct both clinical and basic…

Education
8
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
9
Glen Cove Hospital

Glen cove hospital is part of northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality geriatric care; educating the current and future…

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
12
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taft School Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Walt Ronan Educational Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCharter and Independent Sch…Childhood Cancer SupportUrban Agriculture EducationJewish Community FederationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity FoundationsCommunity Theater CompaniesEnvironmental Advocacy and …Government Accountability &…Community Hospital SystemsYouth Sports ProgramsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%51%35–55yr16%41%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $1,134,425 · PhilanthropyRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND+4 more — $11,750 · PhilanthropyDUKE UNIVERSITY — $394,450 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $308,500 · EducationTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION+2 more — $30,000 · EducationSHELBURNE FARMS — $165,000 · EnvironmentWorld Monument Fund — $60,000 · OtherNorthwell Health Fdtn — $20,000 · OtherMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Society — $12,500 · OtherPediatric Urology Research Foundation — $11,250 · OtherPhysicians for Human Rigts — $10,000 · OtherNorthern Country Camp Fdtn — $10,000 · OtherCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $10,000 · Other+16 more — $33,800 · OtherWinifred Masterson Burke Medical Research — $50,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthDANIEL W OFFIT FUND TO FIGHT GLIOBLASTOMA INC — $5,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 · HealthBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $5,000 · HealthTHE SATO PROJECT — $17,000 · AnimalsWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $5,000 · AnimalsTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $15,000 · Arts & CultureBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC — $1,000 · Arts & CultureARTSCONNECTION INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$1,146,175Education$732,950Environment$165,000Other$167,550Health$70,000Animals$22,000Arts & Culture$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $1,134,425 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $394,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION — $308,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS — $165,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWinifred Masterson Burke Medical Research — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Childrens Academy — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SATO PROJECT — $17,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL W OFFIT FUND TO FIGHT GLIOBLASTOMA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER COALITION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE TOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBLYTHEDALE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD COUNT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUCKER CAMPERSHIP FUND INC % RICHARD DEITCHMAN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetARTSCONNECTION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALT RONAN EDUCATIONAL FUND INC — $750 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to McDowell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to McDowell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $384k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph