Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

McDonnell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$1.0MHuman Services$889kRecreation & Sports$385kPhilanthropy$308kReligion$220kHealth$210kPublic Benefit$136kCivil Rights$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL IN FOSTERING FUTURES$100,000
MILLION KIDS$50,000
KINGDOM CONVERSATIONS$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE$5,000
ACTIV8 SPORTS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $374k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDHELP: $56k → 11%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $50k → 14%TREELINE PASS: $2k → 8%ADOPT COLORADO KIDS: $13k → 9%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $50k → 14%THE ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $48k → 8%TOGETHER FOR GOOD: $50k → 14%THE ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $25k → 8%THE ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $25k → 8%RAISE THE FUTURE: $25k → 12%ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%THE NARROW DOOR: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 15 repeat orgs$306k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
20

Total granted

$2.9M
$291k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+12%

Still filing today

53%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IJ
    INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +75%
  • MH
    MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22
    6× · 2017–2023 · $310k · revenue +178%
  • AI
    All In Empowering Futures Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $200k · revenue +87% · 54% of their budget

Funded once

  • CI
    CHILDHELP INC
    one grant, 2021 · $56k · revenue -6%
  • GS
    GOOD SHEPHERD ASSEMBLY OF GOD
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • TW
    THE WELLSPRING CHURCH CV
    one grant, 2020 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
2
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
3
Childd Ministry

Meeting with special needs families, provide training to teachers in order to advise and consult special needs families, conduct meetings to discuss organizational needs and training to expand ministry and reach. Provide content and…

Education
4
New Road Missions

We are compelled by god's word to provide security, education and the hope of jesus to children in south africa so they can thrive personally and impact their future families, communities and the kingdom of god.

Religion
5
Pathways Youth and Family Services Inc

Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.

Human Services
6
Deliver Rescuing Children At Risk

Finding forever homes for children

Human Services
7
Beautiful Redemption

Beautiful redemption is the bridge between the faith community and meeting the needs of foster children. we connect the faith community to requests that come from the desk of dhs and the system we use is the only one of its kind. we speak…

Human Services
8
Onward Hope Incorporated

We are committed to improving and assisting the successful transition of at-risk young people to independent adulthood and supporting resilient families, by connecting them to resources.

Human Services
9
Angel Reach

Through providing a coordinated family of services aimed at meeting the special needs of this group of young people, aged-out foster youth, Angel Reach is first committed to assuring the safety and security of all children and youth in…

Human Services
10
Kidz At Heart International

KidZ at Heart International is a global Christian community that trains, partners with, and mobilizes networks of leaders to help children fall deeply in love with Jesus. We train and partner with churches and families to successfully…

Religion
11
The Miracle Foundation Inc

A family for every child in our lifetime.

Health
12
The Orphans Hands Inc

The Orphan's Hands provides a safe home and education for orphaned youth at risk of being trafficked in high-risk countries while bringing the love and hope of Jesus.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Conversations. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $1,000,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION+1 more — $5,000 · InternationalACTIV8 — $385,000 · OtherACTIV8AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ARMED FORCES — $135,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ARMED…HEARTBEAT 22 — $82,000 · OtherHEARTBEAT 22THE HEALTHY ME PROJECT — $50,000 · OtherTHE HEALTHY ME PROJECTGOOD SHEPHERD ASSEMBLY OF GOD — $30,000 · Other+13 more — $162,350 · Other+13 moreMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 — $310,000 · Human ServicesMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES …TOGETHER FOR GOOD — $150,000 · Human ServicesTOGETHER FOR GOODRAISE THE FUTURE — $123,451 · Human ServicesRAISE THE FUTURECHILDHELP INC — $56,250 · Human ServicesCHILDHELP INCROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Human Services+3 more — $19,515 · Human ServicesMillion Kids — $305,000 · PhilanthropyMillion Ki…All In Empowering Futures Inc — $200,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $101,500 · HealthGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $25,000 · HealthKingdom Conversations — $10,000 · ReligionThe Potter's Wheel Inc — $6,000 · ReligionACTIV8 SPORTS INC — $5,000 · ReligionSAVE OUR YOUTH INC — $10,000 · Crime & Legal
International$1,005,000Other$844,850Human Services$684,216Philanthropy$305,000Youth Development$203,000Health$126,500Religion$21,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION — $1,000,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 — $310,000 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetMillion Kids — $305,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetAll In Empowering Futures Inc — $200,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetTOGETHER FOR GOOD — $150,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetRAISE THE FUTURE — $123,451 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $101,500 over 2y, 18% of budgetCHILDHELP INC — $56,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEALTHY ME PROJECT — $50,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmericas Kids Belong — $13,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAVE OUR YOUTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKingdom Conversations — $10,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetThe Potter's Wheel Inc — $6,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTIV8 SPORTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNARROW DOOR — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMorning Star Boys Ranch — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREELINE PASS INC — $1,515 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION
  • Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22
  • Who funds Million Kids
  • Who funds All In Empowering Futures Inc
  • Who funds TOGETHER FOR GOOD
  • Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE
  • Who funds LIMB PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CHILDHELP INC
  • Who funds THE HEALTHY ME PROJECT
  • Who funds GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Americas Kids Belong
  • Who funds SAVE OUR YOUTH INC
  • Who funds Kingdom Conversations
  • Who funds The Potter's Wheel Inc
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds ACTIV8 SPORTS INC
  • Who funds NARROW DOOR
  • Who funds Morning Star Boys Ranch
  • Who funds TREELINE PASS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO17.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization McDonnell Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McDonnell Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McDonnell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph