Skip to content

· Private foundation

McDonald Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$843k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$1.5MEducation$1.1MHealth$731kHuman Services$362kHousing & Shelter$270kInternational$231kPublic Safety & Disaster$154kCivil Rights$154kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $603k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $212k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JESUITS WEST PROVINCE$100,000
SANTA TERESITA MEDICAL CENTER$56,000
THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE$56,000
NPH USA$42,000
ST MICHAEL'S ABBEY AND SCHOOL$40,000
CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC$28,000
ST FRANCIS HOME$28,000
SISTERS OF NAZARETH OF LOS ANGELES$28,000
CASA TERESA INC$28,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES - USCCB$28,000
SALESIAN MISSIONS INC$28,000
COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA$28,000
BRIDGE TRUST$28,000
BELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY$28,000
SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $324k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $14k → 8%WELLS OF LIFE INC: $14k → 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $14k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $13k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $12k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $12k → 8%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $12k → 8%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $42k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $28k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $26k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $24k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $24k → 14%LAURA'S HOUSE: $14k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $24k → 14%LAURA'S HOUSE: $14k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $13k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $12k → 10%LAURA'S HOUSE: $12k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 37 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
5

Total granted

$4.6M
$91k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-18%

Still filing today

43%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthEducationInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $308k · revenue +58%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $231k · revenue +10%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $168k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MICHAEL'S ABBEY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN BOSCO HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN ORCHESTRA EUROPA
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Little Sisters of the Poor Palatine St Josephs Home for the Elderly

The little sisters of the poor operate st. joseph's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france…

Human Services
2
Mary's Shelter

Believing in the value of every life, mary's path empowers vulnerable teen mothers in foster care and their babies to create lives of dignity, hope and self-sufficiency.

Human Services
3
St Vincent Depaul Rehabilitation Service of Texas Inc

Setting a new standard of employment for people who have disabilities and chronic medical conditions.

Employment
4
St John's Rehabilitation Hospital and Nursing Center Inc

St. john's rehabilitation hospital provides nursing and rehabilitation services to individuals of all faiths, regardless of any individuals' ability to pay for services, including routine and ancillary care, in support of the archiocese of…

Health
5
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

—
6
Villa Mary Immaculate

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. villa mary immaculate is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Health
7
St Anne's Nursing Center St Anne's Residence Inc

The organization provides nursing and assisted care to individuals of all faiths regardless of ability to pay.

Health
8
St Jude House Inc

MISSION - ST. JUDE HOUSE, Inc. (St. Jude House) IS a family violence prevention center and shelter; our mission is TO CELEBRATE LIFE AND SERVE WITH JOY. Vision - St. Jude House is a catalyst in Northwest Indiana for the prevention,…

Housing & Shelter
9
Little Sisters of the Poor Chicago St Mary's Home

The little sisters of the poor operate st. mary's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in…

—
10
Sancta Maria Hospital Inc

Faithful to the spirit of the congregation of the daughters of mary, sancta maria nursing facility's mission is to witness christ's compassion, caring and love, reflecting the catholic church's role in the continuation of christ's healing…

—
11
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged

The little sisters of the poor provide nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the organization is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in 1839 and serves the…

Health
12
Saint Joseph Villa

The mission of saint joseph villa is rooted in the mission of the sisters of st. joseph who founded and sponsor the villa. the sisters' mission of uniting people with god and with one another is the primary focus of the staff at the villa.…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the Orphans D/B/a Nph-Usa; the most unlike its peers is The Bridge Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JESUITS WEST PROVINCE: $600,000 · OtherJESUITS WEST PROVINCESANTA TERESITA MEDICAL CENTER: $308,000 · OtherSANTA TERESITA MEDICAL CENTERST MICHAEL'S ABBEY AND SCHOOL: $198,000 · OtherST MICHAEL'S ABBEY AND SCHOOLSISTERS OF NAZARETH OF LOS ANGELES: $154,000 · OtherCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $154,000 · OtherBELLARMINE COLLEGE PREPARATORY: $154,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $154,000 · OtherSALESIAN MISSIONS INC: $154,000 · OtherTHE BRIDGE TRUST: $154,000 · OtherMATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANGE: $120,000 · OtherSERVITE HIGH SCHOOL: $120,000 · Other+18 more: $1,006,500 · Other+18 moreCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $168,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HO…CASA TERESA INC: $154,000 · Human ServicesCASA TERESA…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $77,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS …LAURA'S HOUSE: $65,000 · Human ServicesLAURA'S HOU…+1 more: $14,000 · Human ServicesTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $308,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $231,000 · InternationalTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $65,000 · ReligionSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $51,000 · ReligionSpitzer-Magis Center FKA Magis Institute: $38,500 · ReligionJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $120,000 · Arts & CultureLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES: $52,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN VIANNEY CENTER: $39,000 · Health
Other$3,276,500Human Services$478,000Education$308,000International$231,000Religion$154,500Arts & Culture$120,000Health$91,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $308,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA: $231,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $168,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCASA TERESA INC: $154,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BRIDGE TRUST: $154,000 over 6y, 85% of budgetJUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetXAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $77,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $77,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $65,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NAPA INSTITUTE: $65,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES: $52,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC: $51,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetSAINT JOHN VIANNEY CENTER: $39,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSpitzer-Magis Center FKA Magis Institute: $38,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFISHER HOUSE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $38,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetOBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $38,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetWELLS OF LIFE INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ORPHANS D/B/A NPH-USA ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CASA TERESA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds JUNIPERO SERRA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds THE NAPA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds SPIRIT FILLED HEARTS MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN VIANNEY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Spitzer-Magis Center FKA Magis Institute ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds OBRIA MEDICAL CLINICS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ayco Charitable FoundationNY17.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · The Levecke Family Foundation · B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Farmers & Merchants Bank Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McDonald Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McDonald Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to McDonald Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to McDonald Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McDonald Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph