Skip to content
McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na at a glance

· Private foundation

McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$42M
Granted FY2025still arriving
81
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$9.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$46MArts & Culture$34MCommunity Improvement$31MPhilanthropy$30MHuman Services$23MHealth$21MEnvironment$9.2MHousing & Shelter$4.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 81 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k14 grants · $370k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $4.3M
  • $250k+32 grants · $37M
$150,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$91M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEGHENY COLLEGE$9,000,000
RIVERS OF STEEL INDUSTRY HERITAGE CORP$4,739,000
LIFESTEPS INC$3,000,000
ADELPHOI INC$3,000,000
TOUCHSTONE CENTER FOR CRAFTS$2,500,000
ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY$2,000,000
RIVERVIEW CHILDREN'S CENTER$1,500,000
ANGELS PLACE$1,325,000
GRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA$844,750
WOMEN'S CENTER & SHELTER OF PITTSBURGH$750,000
Individual grant recipient$750,000
BLIND & VISION REHABILITATION$650,000
FAMILYLINKS INC$650,000
SQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER$500,000
GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$475,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $16.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER PGH: $350k → 11%WESTMORELAND COMMUNITY ACTION: $180k → 10%CITY MISSION LIVING STONES: $185k → 17%Off the Floor Pittsburgh: $70k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $650k → 11%FAMILY LINKS: $575k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $400k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $175k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $116k → 11%WATSON INSTITUTE: $100k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $25k → 11%RIVERVIEW CHILDREN'S CENTER: $1.5M → 11%RIVERVIEW CHILDREN'S CENTER: $300k → 11%RIVERVIEW CHILDREN'S CENTER: $75k → 11%BLIND & VISION REHABILITATION: $650k → 11%VERLAND FOUNDATION: $72k → 11%BLIND & VISION REHABILITATION: $50k → 11%EASTER SEALS WESTERN AND CENTRAL PA: $16k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE: $650k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE: $150k → 11%CENTER FOR VICTIMS: $100k → 11%CITY OF ASYLUM PITTSBURGH: $150k → 11%CITY OF ASYLUM PITTSBURGH: $115k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $75k → 11%CITY OF ASYLUM PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $605k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $271k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $115k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $115k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $115k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $1.5M → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%NEW SUN RISING: $76k → 11%WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%GLADE RUN LUTHERAN SERVICES: $50k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE: $750k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE: $750k → 11%PRESBYTERIAN SENIOR CARE: $580k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $145k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $95k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $60k → 11%THE CITIZENS SCIENCE LAB: $25k → 11%THE CITIZENS SCIENCE LAB: $25k → 11%FAMILY RESOURCES: $25k → 11%AMACHI PITTSBURGH: $25k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $430k → 11%YMCA OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $125k → 11%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $3.5M → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$225M · 149 repeat orgs$28M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

149 repeat relationships: 70 still active in FY2025, 79 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

149
79

Total granted

$225M
$28M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+9%

Still filing today

74%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $760k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALLEGHENY COLLEGE
    4× · 2020–2025 · $16M · revenue +5%
  • CU
    CARLOW UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2025 · $13M · revenue +57%
  • HH
    HOSANNA HOUSE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8.6M · revenue +18% · 50% of their budget

Funded once

  • DE
    DOLLAR ENERGY FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3.0M · revenue +81%
  • PC
    PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3.0M · revenue +11%
  • PG
    PITTSBURGH GATEWAYS CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3.0M · revenue -7% · 70% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
2
Pittsburgh Entertainment Project

To create a vibrant, responsible, and sustainable film and digital media sector in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
3
Allegheny Conference On Community Development

See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…

—
4
Scenic Pittsburgh

To protect, preserve, and promote the scenic resources of southwestern pennsylvania.

Environment
5
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
6
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
7
World Affairs Council of Pittsburgh

The world affairs council of pittsburgh's mission is to convene and connect people around global issues to build a competitive, thriving, and inclusive pittsburgh.

International
8
Pittsburgh Arts & Lectures Inc

The mission of pittsburgh arts & lectures is to connect celebrated authors with the community, elevate civic discourse, and inspire creativity and a passion for the literary arts. our commitment to knowledge, learning, integrity, and…

Arts & Culture
9
Pittsburgh Venture Capital Association

The pittsburgh venture capital association was founded in 1982 to catalyze venture investment and entrepreneurialism in western pennsylvania. since then it has become the leading voice of private equity investors in the region.through a…

—
10
Pittsburgh Business Group On Health

An employer-led coalition that champions outcomes-based, cost-effective healthcare through education, market expertise, group purchasing, comparative data and decision support.

—
11
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
12
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Pittsburgh Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Citizen Science Lab. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

173 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 173 of the 241 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

29
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
171/173
Grantees still filing
119/173
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE: $21,259,450 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THEALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK: $12,000,000 · OtherALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORKRIVERS OF STEEL INDUSTRY HERITAGE CORP: $5,820,000 · OtherANDY WARHOL MUSEUM: $4,130,000 · OtherHOSANNA HOUSE INC: $8,560,288 · OtherHOSANNA HOUSE INC+93 more: $61,760,820 · Other+93 moreALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $15,825,000 · EducationALLEGHENY COLLEGECARLOW UNIVERSITY: $13,110,000 · EducationCARLOW UNIVERSITYLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $4,200,000 · EducationLITERACY PITTSBURGHLIFESTEPS INC: $3,550,000 · EducationLIFESTEPS INCTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $2,475,000 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $2,469,061 · EducationSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $2,260,000 · EducationSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $2,010,183 · Education+21 more: $9,192,597 · Education+21 moreNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC: $8,450,000 · Community ImprovementNEIGHBORHOO…MON VALLEY INITIATIVE: $8,320,000 · Community ImprovementMON VALLEY …PITTSBURGH DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP: $3,515,214 · Community ImprovementPITTSBURGH …THE PROGRESS FUND: $2,000,000 · Community ImprovementTHE PROGRES…+10 more: $4,131,000 · Community Improvement+10 morePITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $3,700,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH …PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION: $3,468,635 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH …TOUCHSTONE CENTER FOR CRAFTS: $3,395,000 · Arts & CultureTOUCHSTONE …WESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $2,770,901 · Arts & CultureWESTMORELAN…PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC: $2,600,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH …PITTSBURGH FESTIVAL OPERA: $1,085,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION: $970,000 · Arts & CultureCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $950,000 · Arts & CultureThe City Theatre Company Inc: $925,000 · Arts & Culture+16 more: $5,389,954 · Arts & Culture+16 moreWESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $3,501,000 · Human ServicesPresbyterian SeniorCare: $2,880,000 · Human ServicesRIVERVIEW CHILDRENS CENTER: $1,875,000 · Human ServicesFAMILYLINKS INC: $1,625,000 · Human ServicesWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC: $1,580,000 · Human ServicesNEW SUN RISING: $1,297,000 · Human ServicesVISABILITY: $700,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH: $555,000 · Human Services+10 more: $2,018,000 · Human ServicesRIVERLIFE: $5,759,385 · EnvironmentPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $3,000,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $1,398,088 · EnvironmentVENTURE OUTDOORS INC: $750,000 · EnvironmentCONSTRUCTION JUNCTION INC: $565,000 · EnvironmentPENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC: $500,000 · EnvironmentALLEGHENY LAND TRUST: $485,000 · Environment+2 more: $475,000 · EnvironmentWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,212,500 · PhilanthropyGRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $1,890,625 · PhilanthropyPOISE FOUNDATION: $1,718,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $1,025,000 · Philanthropy+3 more: $704,099 · Philanthropy
Other$113,530,558Education$55,091,841Community Improvement$26,416,214Arts & Culture$25,254,490Human Services$16,031,000Environment$12,932,473Philanthropy$9,550,224

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLEGHENY COLLEGE: $15,825,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetCARLOW UNIVERSITY: $13,110,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetHOSANNA HOUSE INC: $8,560,288 over 5y, 50% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC: $8,450,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetMON VALLEY INITIATIVE: $8,320,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetRIVERLIFE: $5,759,385 over 4y, 53% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $4,212,500 over 1y, 52% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH: $4,200,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetPITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC: $3,700,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetLIFESTEPS INC: $3,550,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetPITTSBURGH DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP: $3,515,214 over 2y, 37% of budgetWESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $3,501,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION: $3,468,635 over 2y, 30% of budgetTOUCHSTONE CENTER FOR CRAFTS: $3,395,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $3,306,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetDOLLAR ENERGY FUND INC: $3,000,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $3,000,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER: $3,000,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetPITTSBURGH GATEWAYS CORPORATION: $3,000,000 over 1y, 70% of budgetPresbyterian SeniorCare: $2,880,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetWESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $2,770,901 over 2y, 41% of budgetROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $2,710,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC: $2,600,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $2,475,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH: $2,469,061 over 3y, 8.9% of budgetSAINT VINCENT COLLEGE: $2,260,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSHADY SIDE ACADEMY: $2,010,183 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetTHE PROGRESS FUND: $2,000,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetGRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $1,890,625 over 6y, 16% of budgetRIVERVIEW CHILDRENS CENTER: $1,875,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetPOISE FOUNDATION: $1,718,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetFAMILYLINKS INC: $1,625,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC: $1,580,000 over 3y, 35% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $1,500,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAngels Place Inc: $1,420,000 over 3y, 49% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $1,398,088 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $1,375,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW SUN RISING: $1,297,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetWINCHESTER THURSTON SCHOOL: $1,250,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetPITTSBURGH FESTIVAL OPERA: $1,085,000 over 4y, 49% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $1,075,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION: $1,025,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLIFE'SWORK OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $1,000,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetPITTSBURGH PUBLIC THEATER CORPORATION: $970,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE: $950,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $925,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe City Theatre Company Inc: $925,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetALLEGHENY COUNCIL TO IMPROVE OUR NEIGHBORHOODS-HOUSING INCORPORATED: $837,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALLEGHENY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CARLOW UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HOSANNA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MON VALLEY INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds RIVERLIFE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESTEPS INC ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TOUCHSTONE CENTER FOR CRAFTS ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds DOLLAR ENERGY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PHIPPS CONSERVATORY AND BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds SQUIRREL HILL HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH GATEWAYS CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Presbyterian SeniorCare ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds SAINT VINCENT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SHADY SIDE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE PROGRESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds RIVERVIEW CHILDRENS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POISE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hillman Family Founda…The Pittsburgh Founda…The Heinz EndowmentsRichard King Mellon F…The Grable FoundationThe Buhl FoundationEden Hall FoundationThe Jack Buncher Foun…The United Way of Sou…Eqt FoundationThe Fine FoundationAllegheny Foundation
Hillman Family FoundationsPA178× affinity108 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hillman Family Foundations · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Heinz Endowments · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · The Jack Buncher Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · Eqt Foundation · The Fine Foundation · Allegheny Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    81report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 241 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCune Foundation Pnc Bank Na’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home