Skip to content

· Private foundation

McCatur Christian Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$424k
Granted FY2020
27
Grants FY2020
14
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k23 grants · $66k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $313k
$3,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Morgan Stanley Gift$200,000
National Christian Foundation$112,960
Focus on the Farmily$35,209
Fellowship of Christian Athletes$10,000
Global Faith Mission$7,000
Campus Outreach Serve$7,000
Daymark Pastoral Counseling$5,500
First Bible Church$5,000
Heritage Foundation$5,000
Judicial Watch$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
Nations of Coaches$3,000
Neighborhood Christian Center$3,000
World Gospel Mission$3,000
Youth for Christ$2,400
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Neighborhood Christian Center: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
IN
CA
CO
MO
AZ
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
2
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

The corporation makes distributions to or for christian churches, ministries, and other charities

Philanthropy
3
National Christian Foundation Orlando Inc

To encourage and facilitate greater charitable giving by offering simple, innovative, and efficient giving tools to support charities, churches, and christian ministries.

Philanthropy
4
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
5
Greater Austin Christian Foundation

Mobilizing resources by inspiring biblical generosity in the greater austin, texas area.

Religion
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
8
Mission Increase

Mission increase equips donors, nonprofits, and churches to multiply their collective kingdom impact, so that more lives are transformed for jesus.

Philanthropy
9
Kingdom Advisors Inc

Kingdom advisors is a discipleship ministry serving christian financial professionals. the organization encourages, educates, and empowers christian financial professionals with biblical wisdom to be effective disciples of jesus christ in…

Religion
10
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
11
American Anglican Council

Aac's purpose is to build up and defend great commission anglican churches in north america through developing faithful leaders, equipping local churches and engaging the church and culture with gospel clarity.

Religion
12
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $200,000 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $112,960 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $35,209 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMIL…Global Faith Mission: $7,000 · OtherGlobal Faith Missi…First Bible Church: $5,000 · OtherFirst Bible ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant r…World Gospel Mission: $3,000 · OtherPIONEERS: $2,400 · OtherYouth for Christ: $2,400 · OtherAvant: $2,400 · Other+7 more: $7,260 · Other+7 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONS OF COACHES INC: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Public BenefitCAMPUS OUTREACH SERVE INC: $7,000 · ReligionLAUNCH GLOBAL: $2,400 · ReligionDAYMARK PASTORAL COUNSELING INC: $5,500 · HealthProvision Cares Foundation Inc: $1,000 · HealthCASTING FOR HOPE: $415 · HealthNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $3,000 · Human Services
Philanthropy$312,960Other$68,669Youth Development$13,000Public Benefit$10,000Religion$9,400Health$6,915Human Services$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $200,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPUS OUTREACH SERVE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAYMARK PASTORAL COUNSELING INC: $5,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONS OF COACHES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHRISTIAN CENTER OF AL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAUNCH GLOBAL: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProvision Cares Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASTING FOR HOPE: $415 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCatur Christian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCatur Christian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McCatur Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph