Loading…
· Private foundation
MCCATUR CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$424k
Granted FY2020
27
Grants
14
Communities
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2020 · 27 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k23 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $313k
$3,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- Morgan Stanley Gift$200,000
- National Christian Foundation$112,960
- Focus on the Farmily$35,209
- Fellowship of Christian Athletes$10,000
- Global Faith Mission$7,000
- Campus Outreach Serve$7,000
- Daymark Pastoral Counseling$5,500
- Heritage Foundation$5,000
- First Bible Church$5,000
- Judicial Watch$5,000
- Key Life$4,000
- World Gospel Mission$3,000
- Nations of Coaches$3,000
- Neighborhood Christian Center$3,000
- Youth for Christ$2,400
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
National Christian Foundation
To inspire, teach, and encourage followers of Christ to radical, joyful, and infectious generosity.
Philanthropy
2
Providence Christian College
The college provides a post-secondary liberal arts education from a historic Reformed Christian Perspective.
Education
3
Practical Christianity Foundation
Religion
4
National Christian Community Foundation
National Christian Community Foundation NCCF is a public charity providing charitable structures for donors to support Christian causes meaningful to them.
—
5
The Faith Foundation
—
6
Global Faith Network
Human Services
7
Oklahoma Christian University
Oklahoma Christian University Exists to educate, mentor, and inspire students to fulfill their potential and transform their lives through Christian faith, scholarship, and service.
Education
8
The Covenant Foundation
—
9
The Christian Century
Publication of religious magazine.
Arts & Culture
10
Foundation for Clinical Pastoral
To advance experience-based theological education for seminarians,clergy, and lay persons of diverse cultures, ethinic groups and faith traditions by supporting and benefiting the association for clinical pastoral education, inc (the…
Religion
11
The Christian Chronicle Inc
The christian chronicle is an oklahoma nonprofit since 1981 that publishes a monthly newspaper for the church of christ and maintains a news website.
Arts & Culture
12
Global Impact for Christ
To inspire, equip and facilitate the spreading of the gospel of jesus christ globally with education, cross-cultural training, and church planting.
Religion
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Christian Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$268,669Philanthropy$112,960Youth Development$13,000Public Benefit$10,000Religion$9,400Health$6,915Human Services$3,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds National Christian Foundation ↗
- Who funds Fellowship of Christian Athletes ↗
- Who funds Campus Outreach Serve ↗
- Who funds Daymark Pastoral Counseling ↗
- Who funds Heritage Foundation ↗
- Who funds Judicial Watch ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Christian Center ↗
- Who funds Nations of Coaches ↗
- Who funds Launch Global ↗
- Who funds Prager University foundation ↗
- Who funds Undone Redone ↗
- Who funds Provision Cares Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Hillsdale College ↗
- Who funds Alliance Defending Freedom ↗
- Who funds Casting for Hope ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MCCATUR CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Daymark Pastoral Counseling.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 631193157 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Daymark Pastoral Counseling, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to McCatur Christian Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to McCatur Christian Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines