· Private foundation
McCarthy Family Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Mansfield Cares | $10,000 |
| Young Life Colorado Springs | $8,120 |
| Redeemer Bible Church | $3,000 |
| Mary's Shelter | $2,500 |
| American Studio | $2,500 |
| St Jude Children's Research Hospita | $2,500 |
| Walter Reed Society Inc | $2,500 |
| Southeastern Legal Foundation | $2,500 |
| Parents Defending Education | $2,500 |
| The Family Foundation of Virginia | $2,500 |
| Tunnel to Towers Foundation | $2,500 |
| Society of St Vincent De Paul | $2,500 |
| No Boundaries Military Inc | $2,500 |
| Fredericksburg Regional Food Bank | $2,500 |
| Got Questions Ministries | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GMGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC5× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +34%
- NSNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +59%
- MWMETROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS INTERFAITH CHAPELS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- CSCUA SCHOOL OF MUSICone grant, 2018 · $25k
- CPCapitol Post Incone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -84%
- SESOUTHERN EVANGELICAL SEMINARYgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide legal representation to defend the constitutional right of religious freedom, and the separation of church and state in the united states military. to educate the public regarding the constitutional right of religious freedom,…
To provide thoughtful, conservative solutions to the challenges presented by education, workforce, labor and employment issues.
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
To provide at no cost legal assistance to veterans of the u.s. armed forces and current service members.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of the freedom research foundation is to send americans to confront our enemies by empowering those who share our values. we believe in the foundational principles that made america the greatest political achievement in human…
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
To inform and educate the American public on issues of national security and advocate for a strong national foreign policy that best serves the interests of the United States.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
Secure our freedom foundation is a group of patriotic americans determined to defend the constitutional freedoms that serve as the foundation of american liberty and democracy. these individual liberties are under attack by extreme voices…
Freedom Fighters Foundation is a non-profit civil liberties organization dedicated to the core principles of constitutionally limited government, conservative family values, free markets and individual liberty. Our mission is to advance…
The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Mary's Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MANSFIELD CARES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS INTERFAITH CHAPELS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Capitol Post Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN STUDIO ↗
- Who funds Mary's Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds Africa New Day Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN LEGAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN EVANGELICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds SWANSONG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREDERICKSBURG REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CIVILIZATION WORKS ↗
- Who funds The Family Foundation of Virginia ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ST TERESA OF CALCUTTA CONFERENCE ↗
- Who funds WALTER REED SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN VALUES ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES OF THE WOUNDED FUND INC ↗
- Who funds America First Legal Foundation ↗
- Who funds DEFENDING EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Got Questions Ministries ↗
- Who funds Moms for America Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MAXIMUS JANTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE ↗
- Who funds DOCUMENTARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE 85 FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Usher Family Foundation · The Sandra & Lawrence Post Family Foundation · The Snider Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · California Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization McCarthy Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to McCarthy Family Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to McCarthy Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.