Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

MC Sukut Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Education$210kAnimals$20kReligion$18kEnvironment$15kArts & Culture$10kHealth$10kHuman Services$10kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$580k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$100,000
CAPISTRANO VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC$50,000
OTRA-MAS$10,000
KISS THE GROUND$5,000
CAPISTRANO VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AGAPE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$220k · 3 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
10

Total granted

$220k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
0%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EducationAnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $120k · revenue +4%
  • CV
    Capistrano Valley Christian Schools Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $85k · revenue +17%
  • KT
    KISS THE GROUND
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • AP
    AGAPE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • RT
    RETURN TO FREEDOM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • HI
    HEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +20%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Pacific University

Los angeles pacific university exists to deliver high quality, accessible christ-centered education to learners everywhere.

Education
2
Pacific Theological Seminary

To deliver biblically-based education and ministry mentoring through graduate-level degree programs.

Education
3
California Baptist University

A private institution of higher education, offering both undergraduate and graduate courses to students.

Education
4
Heritage Christian Schools Inc

The mission of heritage christian school is to glorify god through the discipleship of students and the pursuit of excellence in education with the bible as the foundation and jesus christ as our focus.

Education
5
Valley Christian School System

In the light of the lordship of jesus christ and the authority of god's word, we will educate each unique student in cooperation with the christian community so that he or she is equipped and inspired to make a difference for jesus christ…

Education
6
Ojai Valley School

Operation of a boarding school

Education
7
His University

His university provides graduate and undergraduate degree and diploma education and training for his family ministry specialists who desire to pursue careers in counseling and ministry.

Education
8
Contra Costa Christian Schools Association

To provide christian education to students from preschool through high school

Education
9
Hope International University

The mission of hope international university is to empower students through christian higher education to serve the church and impact the world for christ. the university specializes in fields offering significant influence on society…

Education
10
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
11
Los Angeles Mission Inc

The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.

Housing & Shelter
12
Ariel Ministries

Ariel ministries exists to bring the good news of the messiah to jewish people and to disciple believers through intensive bible teaching from a messianic jewish perspective and dispensational theological position. continued on schedule o

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Azusa Pacific University and the most unlike its peers is Premiere Christian Education Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $120,000 · EducationAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITYCapistrano Valley Christian Schools Inc — $85,000 · EducationCapistrano Valley Christian Schools Inc+1 more — $5,000 · EducationCROSSPOINTE — $7,500 · OtherSOUTHALL CHURCH INC — $5,000 · OtherCROSSLINE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherFOREST HOME INC — $5,000 · OtherRETURN TO FREEDOM INC — $10,000 · AnimalsOTRA-MAS INC — $10,000 · AnimalsKISS THE GROUND — $15,000 · Food & NutritionAGAPE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · InternationalHERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY — $10,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Education$210,000Other$22,500Animals$20,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Human Services$10,000International$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY — $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCapistrano Valley Christian Schools Inc — $85,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKISS THE GROUND — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAGAPE PREGNANCY CENTERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRETURN TO FREEDOM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOTRA-MAS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHERITAGE FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPremiere Christian Education Group Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization MC Sukut Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to MC Sukut Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to MC Sukut Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph