Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mazzolin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$222kArts & Culture$168kHuman Services$145kHealth$66kReligion$61kRecreation & Sports$19kHousing & Shelter$19kYouth Development$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$99,939
LIFE$30,000
MISERICORDIA$26,500
Individual grant recipient$15,000
JOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY$15,000
PATRONS OF THE ARTS FOR THE VATICAN$12,588
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH LAGRANGE$10,000
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,500
OLD ST MARYS CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY$5,000
TRINITY COLLEGE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $700 → 14%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $330 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

51%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$459k · 24 repeat orgs$435k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
38

Total granted

$459k
$324k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+18%

Still filing today

33%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    Big Shoulders Fund
    3× · 2018–2024 · $139k · revenue +67%
  • NY
    NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    3× · 2017–2020 · $24k · revenue +23%
  • NI
    NATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN SPORTS HALL OF FAME
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SV
    SAVE VENICE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $130k · revenue -10%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $99k
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
3
Staten Island University Hospital Foundation

The mission of staten island university hospital's foundation is to achieve philanthropic relationships for support and endowment, providing highest quality care, services and state of the art equipment. philanthropy has played an…

Health
4
Bon Secours New York Health System Inc

Bon secours new york health system, inc. (bsnyhs) is the parent and central organization of an established integrated healthcare delivery system.

—
5
Holy Cross Hospital

The hospital is a catholic health care organization sponsored by the sisters of st. casimir. by our commitment to witness to the healing mission of jesus, we contribute to healthy communities and promote quality health care to all with…

Health
6
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
7
Little Sisters of the Poor Chicago St Mary's Home

The little sisters of the poor operate st. mary's home, which provides nursing and residential care for the needy elderly. the home is part of the international congregation of the little sisters of the poor, which was founded in france in…

—
8
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
The Chicago Home for Incurables

The primary purpose of the chicago home for incurables, ("the home"), is to provide financial support to the university of chicago for the operation of patient care facilities and funding of research of incurable diseases at the university…

Health
10
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
11
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
12
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Shoulders Fund; the most unlike its peers is Bulgarian Traditions. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $99,282 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCIndividual grant recipient: $47,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLIFE: $40,000 · OtherLIFEMACLEAN CENTER FOR MEDICAL ETHICS: $30,000 · OtherMACLEAN CENTER FOR MEDICAL ETHICSMISERICORDIA: $26,500 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $25,000 · OtherJOHN CABOT UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · Other+57 more: $248,524 · Other+57 moreBig Shoulders Fund: $138,589 · EducationBig Shoulders FundNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $24,000 · EducationNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF…+1 more: $4,500 · EducationSAVE VENICE INC: $130,250 · InternationalSAVE VENICE INCONE WORLD SURGERY: $6,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $5,000 · InternationalNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $16,199 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Arts & CultureBULGARIAN TRADITIONS: $1,000 · Arts & CultureBEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 · HealthJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · HealthPLAY FOR PINK INC: $4,590 · Crime & LegalHouse of the Good Shepherd: $1,030 · Human Services
Other$541,806Education$167,089International$141,250Arts & Culture$25,699Youth Development$10,000Health$8,000Crime & Legal$4,590Human Services$1,030

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $138,589 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAVE VENICE INC: $130,250 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $24,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $16,199 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $15,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetONE WORLD SURGERY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $4,590 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIl Circolo Inc: $3,995 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJOE DIMAGGIO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Children's Charities: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouse of the Good Shepherd: $1,030 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBULGARIAN TRADITIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds SAVE VENICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN SPORTS HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAT THE STREETS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds ONE WORLD SURGERY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mazzolin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mazzolin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mazzolin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph