Skip to content

· Private foundation

Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$18MScience & Tech$1.4MHuman Services$1.3MEducation$835kInternational$415kRecreation & Sports$325kEnvironment$250kPublic Safety & Disaster$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.6M
$150,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$59M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF SAN ANTONIO$500,000
TRINITY UNIVERSITY$289,994
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER$287,340
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$250,880
HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY$250,000
BOYSVILLE INC$180,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$116,666
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$116,666
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$116,666
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 16%LOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%LOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%LOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%LOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%LOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $180k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $180k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $180k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $180k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $180k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $180k → 16%BOYSVILLE INC: $180k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 17 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
14

Total granted

$20M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
0%

Still filing today

47%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $810k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BOYSVILLE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +9%
  • IC
    I CARE SAN ANTONIO INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $415k · revenue +84%
  • RF
    RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST
    5× · 2019–2025 · $315k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TB
    TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $350k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER - 2019 YOUNG INVESTIGATOR AWARD
    one grant, 2021 · $267k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER - 2021 YOUNG INVESTIGATOR AWARD
    one grant, 2021 · $233k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
2
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
3
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
4
Texas Heart Institute

The mission of Texas Heart Institute (THI) is to reduce the devastating toll of cardiovascular disease through innovative and progressive programs in research, education, and improved patient care.

Health
5
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
7
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
8
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
9
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
10
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
11
Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute

The mission of the texas healthcare and bioscience institute is to research, develop, and advocate policies and actions that promote biomedical science, biotechnology, agriculture and medical device innovation in texas.

—
12
Scott & White Memorial Hospital

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Retina Foundation of the Southwest; the most unlike its peers is Meadows Mental Health Policy Institute for Texas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $4,433,876 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER - YOUNG INVESTIGATOR AWARD: $4,049,997 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER - YOUNG INVESTIGATOR AWARDUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $3,606,897 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTERCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF SAN ANTONIO: $2,960,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF SAN ANTONIO+17 more: $3,496,682 · Other+17 moreTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $800,000 · HealthTHE FOUND…TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $350,000 · HealthTEXAS BIO…RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST: $315,000 · HealthRETINA FO…American Heart Association Inc: $267,388 · HealthAmerican …+3 more: $95,000 · HealthBOYSVILLE INC: $1,260,000 · Human Services+1 more: $35,000 · Human ServicesI CARE SAN ANTONIO INC: $415,000 · InternationalTrinity University: $304,994 · EducationBRIGHTON CENTER: $50,000 · EducationSAN ANTONIO YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationPHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY: $250,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$18,547,452Health$1,827,388Human Services$1,295,000International$415,000Education$394,994Recreation & Sports$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYSVILLE INC: $1,260,000 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $800,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetI CARE SAN ANTONIO INC: $415,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $350,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST: $315,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTrinity University: $304,994 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $267,388 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY: $250,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAUGUSTHEART: $50,000 over 2y, 8.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER INC: $35,000 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetMEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBELIEVE IT FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds I CARE SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHIL HARDBERGER PARK CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTHEART ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO YOUNG WOMEN'S LEADERSHIP ACADEMY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOW VISION RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEADOWS MENTAL HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE FOR TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · The Dixie Starnes Wenger Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Max and Minnie Tomerlin Voelcker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph