Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maurice J Cotter & Muriel J Sheahan Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$161kFood & Nutrition$38kHealth$20kEnvironment$14kEducation$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kScience & Tech$4kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,025
Median grant
5
States reached
$840k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$10,000
ISLAND HARVEST$8,300
ISABELLA STEWARD GARDEN MUSEUM$3,560
OPENING ACT$3,120
NGA - NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$2,057
FRICK COLLECTION$1,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE$1,029
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,025
CHESTERFIELD PRO FIRE FIGHTER FUND$1,000
CARLE PLACE FIRE DEPT$1,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MUSEUM PRADO$1,000
VIRGINA MUSEUM OF FINE ART$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISLAND HARVEST: $7k → 7%ISLAND HARVEST: $1k → 7%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $2k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $517 → 6%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $516 → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $8k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $6k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $6k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $5k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $3k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
SD
NJ
CA
KY
VA
NC
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$256k · 28 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
31

Total granted

$256k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+37%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +58%
  • IH
    ISLAND HARVEST LTD
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +110%
  • PL
    PECONIC LAND TRUST INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +306%

Funded once

  • QC
    QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +3%
  • TH
    THE HECKSHIRE MUSEUM OF ART
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
3
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
4
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
5
Berggruen Institute
Education
6
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
7
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
8
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
9
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
10
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
Staten Island Institute of Arts and Sciences dba the Staten Island Museum

Founded in 1881 the Staten Island Museum engages visitors with interdisciplinary exhibitions, public programs, and educational activities for all ages. It is the mission of the Staten Island Museum to spark curiosity and generate…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection; the most unlike its peers is Carle Place Education Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $95,470 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ARTOpening Act Inc: $19,885 · Arts & CultureOpening Act IncAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $6,529 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $12,000 · Arts & Culture+6 moreISABELLA STEWARD GARDEN MUSEUM: $9,160 · OtherISABELLA STEWARD GARDEN MUSEUMNGA - NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART: $8,555 · OtherNGA - NATIONAL GALLERY OF ARTIndividual grant recipient: $7,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipientThe Frick Collection: $7,500 · OtherThe Frick CollectionIndividual grant recipient: $5,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCHOSPICE CARE OF LONG ISLAND: $4,000 · OtherTOURETTE ASSOCIATION: $3,914 · OtherNATIONAL GALLERY: $3,041 · Other+37 more: $26,798 · Other+37 moreISLAND HARVEST LTD: $36,790 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTDMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,212 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PA…PECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $9,287 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $4,125 · EnvironmentCARLE PLACE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $500 · EducationCITY HARVEST INC: $1,010 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $200 · Food & NutritionTHE V FOUNDATION: $500 · Health
Arts & Culture$133,884Other$81,268Human Services$45,002Environment$13,412Education$2,500Food & Nutrition$1,210Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $95,470 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $36,790 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOpening Act Inc: $19,885 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $9,287 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $8,212 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC: $6,529 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetQUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION: $4,125 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY: $3,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc: $2,560 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of the Prado Museum: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCARLE PLACE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetOYSTER BAY RAILROAD MUSEUM: $1,650 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS COLE HISTORIC HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OLANA PARTNERSHIP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $263 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE BERKSHIRE MUSEUM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
  • Who funds Opening Act Inc ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE LOUVRE INC ↗
  • Who funds QUEENS COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds Old Westbury Gardens Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of the Prado Museum ↗
  • Who funds CARLE PLACE EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OYSTER BAY RAILROAD MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maurice J Cotter & Muriel J Sheahan Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maurice J Cotter & Muriel J Sheahan Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maurice J Cotter & Muriel J Sheahan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph