Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maurice & Carol Feinberg Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$5.9M
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$12MEducation$1.3MArts & Culture$799kHealth$255kReligion$209kInternational$130kHousing & Shelter$95kCivil Rights$73kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $239k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $374k
  • $250k+4 grants · $12M
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - STOCK$5,902,524
GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND - STOCK$4,378,712
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$1,025,230
GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND$470,011
THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART$123,500
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL$50,000
UMASS MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT$50,000
MARY MCDOWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
MARY MCDOWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL$36,100
ACLU$33,225
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$20,000
NEXUS$20,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $5k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
UT
CO
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.6M · 37 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
18

Total granted

$2.6M
$791k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+23%

Still filing today

51%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $442k · revenue +17%
  • TG
    THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $250k · revenue +27%
  • FH
    FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • CC
    CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +22%
  • HC
    HARVARD COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $300k
  • CS
    CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE
    one grant, 2020 · $69k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
5
Future Problem Solving Program International Inc

Future problem solving proudly celebrates more than 50 years of placing close to a million young people at the core of a dynamic, purposeful learning experience. each year k-12 students from around the world participate in a variety of…

6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
8
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

9
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
12
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc and the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development CentersFood Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Developmental Disabilities …Independent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%55%35–55yr16%31%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,532

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - STOCK — $5,902,524 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND - STOCKGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND - STOCK — $4,378,712 · OtherGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND - STOCKMARY MCDOWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL — $566,100 · OtherGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND — $470,011 · Other+44 more — $1,564,016 · Other+44 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,025,230 · Community ImprovementTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $441,542 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $27,500 · Arts & CultureCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $300,000 · EducationGOULD ACADEMY — $20,000 · EducationTHE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC — $20,000 · EducationCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC — $12,000 · Education+1 more — $5,500 · EducationTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC — $250,000 · EmploymentTANZANIA EDUCATION CORPORATION — $70,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $50,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $25,000 · InternationalPINE STREET INN INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 · Human Services
Other$12,881,363Community Improvement$1,025,230Arts & Culture$519,042Education$357,500Employment$250,000International$145,000Human Services$65,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $1,025,230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC — $441,542 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $300,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC — $250,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTANZANIA EDUCATION CORPORATION — $70,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $40,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC — $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOULD ACADEMY — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBoston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE TEEN CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF CONTEMPORARY ART INC
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC
  • Who funds TANZANIA EDUCATION CORPORATION
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC
  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC
  • Who funds CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR CHILDREN OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds GOULD ACADEMY
  • Who funds THE CALHOUN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds TRUE COLORS UNITED INC
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN13× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maurice & Carol Feinberg Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc32% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc8% of income from government
  • The Institute of Contemporary Art Inc1% of income from government
  • Brookline Teen Center0% of income from government
  • Connecticut College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maurice & Carol Feinberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Maurice & Carol Feinberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph