Skip to content
Mattingly Baseball Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Mattingly Baseball Charities Inc

Provide funding and services for equipment for baseball, softball, other sports and related youth development activities for the beneift of underprivileged youth, youth leagues, and social welfare and related organizations.

$100k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$261kYouth Development$107kHousing & Shelter$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kRecreation & Sports$27kCrime & Legal$20kEducation$10kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $66,540, the rows itemized in this filing. The $99,790 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $33,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$416k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$40,000
HOLLY'S HOUSE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,540
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%UNITED MTHODIST YOUTH HOME: $30k → 15%UNITED MTHODIST YOUTH HOME: $10k → 15%YWCA: $38k → 15%YWCA: $38k → 15%YWCA: $26k → 15%HOLLY'S HOUSE: $10k → 15%HOLLY'S HOUSE: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$433k · 10 repeat orgs$300k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$433k
$293k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+129%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthReligionRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $101k · revenue +25%
  • YF
    YOUTH FIRST
    3× · 2019–2021 · $60k · revenue +83%
  • NY
    North Youth Baseball Inc
    2× · 2021–2024 · $12k · revenue +134%

Funded once

  • DC
    DREAM CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $85k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2023 · $80k
  • MF
    MISSION FIRST INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue ×11
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
2
Elevate Indianapolis Inc

Our mission is to build long-term, life-changing relationships with Indianapolis urban youth, equipping them to thrive and contribute to their community

Education
3
Indiana Teen Challenge Inc

Residential Faith-based drug and alcohol recovery.

—
4
Harold Hal Kelly Respite House Foundation Inc

We are a halfway house for men in Porter County who are seeking recovery from the disease of addiction and require assistance in their housing, care, and recovery process

Housing & Shelter
5
United Church Home

To provide a safe home for runaway and homeless youth in a dignified, respectful environment empowering each individual towards self-sufficiency.

—
6
Youth Home Inc

To equip and empower youth, adults, and families to become healthier and contributing members of the community by providing compassionate emotional and behavioral intensive residential treatment & qualified residential treatment for ages…

Health
7
Wind Youth Services Inc

Provide Emergency Housing, Supportive Services and Opportunitites to Youth Experiencing Homelessness.

Human Services
8
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Inc

To meet the special needs of each child and family served in order to help improve their quality of life. the board of trustees and staff members of the home are committed to bringing the highest quality resources available to the…

Human Services
9
Eagle Rock Boys Home

Residential care for children

Housing & Shelter
10
Hawthorn Heights Wnc Inc

Providing a safe, nurturing environment for youth in need

Crime & Legal
11
House of Healing Inc

The purpose of House of Healing is to provide Christ-centered mentoring and a safe environment where young people can experience unconditional love, acceptance, growth in their social intelligence and confidence, and work toward…

Human Services
12
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dream Center Evansville; the most unlike its peers is North Youth Baseball Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $95,070 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDREAM CENTER: $85,075 · OtherDREAM CENTERHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $80,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $31,700 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTCOVID-19 RELIEF FUND: $30,000 · OtherCOVID-19 RELIEF FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $23,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherEVANSVILLE CENTRAL BASEBALL: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $32,100 · Other+4 moreYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC: $100,500 · Human ServicesYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIA…United Methodist Youth Home Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesUnited Methodist Youth H…Holly's House Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesHolly's House IncYOUTH FIRST: $60,000 · HealthYOUTH FIRS…HEALING REINS OF KENTUCKY INC: $6,000 · HealthHEALING RE…MISSION FIRST INC: $30,000 · Public BenefitECHO HOUSING CORPORATION: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterDream Center Evansville: $10,000 · ReligionThe Potter's Wheel Inc: $5,500 · ReligionNorth Youth Baseball Inc: $12,250 · Recreation & Sports
Other$428,445Human Services$160,500Health$66,000Public Benefit$30,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Religion$15,500Recreation & Sports$12,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC: $100,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $60,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUnited Methodist Youth Home Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMISSION FIRST INC: $30,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetECHO HOUSING CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHolly's House Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNorth Youth Baseball Inc: $12,250 over 2y, 20% of budgetHEALING REINS OF KENTUCKY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetThe Potter's Wheel Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YWCA OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FIRST ↗
  • Who funds United Methodist Youth Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSION FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds ECHO HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Holly's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds North Youth Baseball Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dream Center Evansville ↗
  • Who funds HEALING REINS OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Potter's Wheel Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Centerpoint Energy Fo…Cecil a and Mabel Len…Welborn Baptist Found…Holiday Management Fo…Evansville Endowment …Baird Foundation IncLilly Endowment IncUniversity of Evansvi…James R Duncan Trust …C Richard Johnson & V…The Bower-Suhrheinric…
Community Foundation Alliance IncIN21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Alliance Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Cecil a and Mabel Lene Hamman Foundation Inc · Welborn Baptist Foundation Inc · Holiday Management Foundation · Evansville Endowment Fund Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · University of Evansville · James R Duncan Trust Uw Fifth Third · C Richard Johnson & Verna Louise Johnson Foundation Inc · The Bower-Suhrheinrich Foundation Fifth Third

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mattingly Baseball Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mattingly Baseball Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mattingly Baseball Charities Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mattingly Baseball Charities Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mattingly Baseball Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home