Skip to content

· Private foundation

Matthew T Mellon Foundation-Ima

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$575k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$80k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

International$483kAnimals$360kFood & Nutrition$275kPhilanthropy$180kHousing & Shelter$165kEnvironment$75kEducation$60kArts & Culture$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $410k
$35,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND$80,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$65,000
ISLAND HARVEST$55,000
CITY HARVEST$55,000
HOUSING WORKS INC$55,000
ANIMALS ASIA$50,000
EVELYN ALEXANDER WILDLIFE REFUGE$50,000
SOCIETY OF JESUS$35,000
PECONIC LAND TRUST$30,000
MAINE RECOEVERY ACCESS PROJECT$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE BAHAMAS HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
NEEDLEPOINT SANCTUARY OF MAINE$20,000
CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION$20,000
ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ALUMNI FOUNDATION$10,000
THE KINGS TRUST USA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $388k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $80k → 8%ISLAND HARVEST: $55k → 7%KNOX COUNTY HOMELESS COALITION: $40k → 11%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $65k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $35k → 8%ISLAND HARVEST: $20k → 7%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $30k → 8%ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $20k → 7%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $25k → 8%TANZANIAN CHILDREN'S FUND: $18k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
NE
VA
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 16 repeat orgs$305k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$1.5M
$220k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+8%

Still filing today

81%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $253k · revenue +17%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $190k · revenue +89%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $170k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • H
    Homeworthy
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -7%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE BAHAMAS HUMANE
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • YA
    YEMEN AID INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +483%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
Islesboro Islands Trust

The mission of Islesboro Islands Trust is to enhance the quality of residents' lives through the preservation of open space, educate all residents as to the value of the island's natural ecosystems, and act as an environmental advocate on…

Philanthropy
3
Wild Earth Allies Inc

Our mission is to protect vital areas of our natural world for the benefit of wildlife, habitats, and people by inspiring collaborative action. Our vision is a world where wildlife and people flourish in healthy ecosystems that sustain us…

Environment
4
Connecticut Farmland Trust Inc

Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements

Food & Nutrition
5
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
6
Earthenable Inc

Earthenable works to solve the housing crisis in africa by revolutionizing the rural housing industry through innovative, affordable, and sustainable home-building solutions. its mission is to create healthier, safer, and climate-resilient…

International
7
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
8
Northeast Wilderness Trust Corporation

Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.

Environment
9
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
10
Kennebunk Land Trust

Kennebunk Land Trust's mission is to permanently conserve and steward land to benefit natural and human communities.

Environment
11
Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…

Environment
12
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Needlepoint Sanctuary of Maine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $253,000 · Human ServicesTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS…ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $95,000 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTDHomeworthy: $40,000 · Human ServicesHomeworthyAsia Wild: $150,000 · AnimalsAsia WildEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $150,000 · AnimalsEvelyn Alexander Wil…Friends of the Bahamas Humane Society Inc: $30,000 · AnimalsFriends of the Baham…UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND: $55,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLANDIDYLL DANDY ARTS: $55,000 · OtherIDYLL DANDY ARTSSOCIETY OF JESUS: $35,000 · OtherSOCIETY OF JESUSFRIENDS OF THE BAHAMAS HUMANE: $30,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE BAHAMAS HUM…MAINE RECOVERY ACCESS PROJECT: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherPECONIC LAND TRUST: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherST PAUL'S SCHOOL ALUMNI FOUNDATION: $15,000 · OtherPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $55,000 · OtherPECONIC LAND TRUST INCFairfield University: $25,000 · OtherFairfield UniversityNeedlepoint Sanctuary of Maine: $20,000 · Other+6 more: $55,000 · Other+6 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $190,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRO…CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · InternationalCAPE ELEUTHERA FO…YEMEN AID INC: $30,000 · InternationalYEMEN AID INCCenter for Third World Organizing: $20,000 · InternationalCenter for Third …CITY HARVEST INC: $170,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVE…HOUSING WORKS INC: $125,000 · Community ImprovementTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $95,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KING'S TRUST USA INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$388,000Animals$330,000Other$425,000International$280,000Food & Nutrition$170,000Community Improvement$125,000Philanthropy$125,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC: $253,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $190,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $170,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAsia Wild: $150,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetEvelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc: $150,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetHOUSING WORKS INC: $125,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $95,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $95,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPECONIC LAND TRUST INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIDYLL DANDY ARTS: $55,000 over 4y, 54% of budgetHomeworthy: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYEMEN AID INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFriends of the Bahamas Humane Society Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetFairfield University: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetNeedlepoint Sanctuary of Maine: $20,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSHIKSHYA FOUNDATION NEPAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSaint Paul School: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KING'S TRUST USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TANZANIAN CHILDRENS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds Asia Wild ↗
  • Who funds Evelyn Alexander Wildlife Rescue Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds PECONIC LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND ↗
  • Who funds IDYLL DANDY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Homeworthy ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YEMEN AID INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the Bahamas Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds Center for Third World Organizing ↗
  • Who funds Needlepoint Sanctuary of Maine ↗
  • Who funds SHIKSHYA FOUNDATION NEPAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Saint Paul School ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S TRUST USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matthew T Mellon Foundation-Ima funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matthew T Mellon Foundation-Ima. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Matthew T Mellon Foundation-Ima’s filings →

More from the funding graph