How much did MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION reported 19 grants totaling $555,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION based?

MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION is based in CA.

MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION

Foundation is committed to raising awareness and fostering understand about the nature of addiction and works to dismantle the barriers of stigma that prevent peope from seeking and receiving care.

$555k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$175k

Largest

01What you fund

01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k17 grants · $325k
$50k–250k2 grants · $225k

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.5M

Total assets

Largest grants

MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$175,000
ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION$50,000
ANGELS AT RISK$40,000
CONTRA COSTA CRISIS CENTER$25,000
AMAAD INSTITUTE$25,000
STITIKE COUNSELING CENTER$25,000
SHASTA COUNTY CHEMICAL PEOPLE$25,000
THE SOURCE LGBT CENTER$20,000
VOICES OF RECOVER SAN MATEO COUNTY$20,000
THE WALL LAS MEMORIAS$20,000
PUEBLO Y SALUD$20,000
CHAMPIONS IN SERVICE$20,000
AMERICAN INDIAN CHILD RESOURCES$15,000
UPPER ROOM REHABILITATION SERVICES$15,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS OLD BALDY POST 2085$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 70% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Alternatives for Better Living

Alternatives helps families stay safe. we offer counseling and education for people at-risk of, or currently experiencing, life problems. this includes criminal justice, parole services, or child welfare involvement. the primary foci of…

Health

Latino Commission On Alcohol and Drug

The Latino Commission provides a multitude of services throughout the counties of San Francisco, San Mateo, and Tulare. The Organization currently employs twelve programs eight for adults, and four for youth and transitional age youth…

Health

Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Services for individuals and families for mental illness, substance use disorders, and trauma.

—

Southern California Alcohol and Drug

Substance abuse prevention, treatment, education, and co-occurring disorders that follow or originate to the same

Health

Stanford Youth Solutions

To help solve the most challenging issues facing youth and families in northern california by providing tailored services from counseling and therapy to alternative placements with an end result of permanently connecting our young clients…

Human Services

Harm Reduction Services Inc

To increase access to health care, empower people to protect themselves, and educate each other to reduce harm in our communities.

Civil Rights

American Society of Addiction Medicine

To increase awareness and improve the quality of care and treatment of addictions.

Health

Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Provide a continuum of behavioral health, substance use, and domestic violence services.

Health

Sexual Assault Services

Saso is dedicated to providing advocacy to victims of sexual assault and providing education and prevention programs aimed at increasing public awareness and safety, in an anti-oppression framework.

—

Bay Area Council On Drugs and

Empowering our community with knowledge and resources to help prevent or stop substance use disorders.

—

Alcohol & Drug Abuse Council

The alcohol and drug abuse council for the concho valley's mission is to save lives and create healthier communities.

—

Rio Grande Alcoholism Treatment

Provide substance abuse treatment, behavioral health services, and access to supportive services, in order to enable men and women to live productive, drug-free lives.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pueblo Y Salud Inc and the most unlike its peers is Palmdale Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

9/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$310,000Health$190,000Crime & Legal$20,000Civil Rights$20,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA16.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Public Health Institute · California Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ANGELS AT RISK.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 261100549 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ANGELS AT RISK, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 40% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Matthew Perry Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Matthew Perry Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Matthew Perry Foundation?

More from the funding graph

MATTHEW PERRY FOUNDATION

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Matthew Perry Foundation?

More from the funding graph