Skip to content

· Private foundation

Matthew 633 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$246k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$726kFood & Nutrition$552kInternational$270kHuman Services$224kHealth$172kCivil Rights$130kHousing & Shelter$84kCrime & Legal$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $237k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lubbock Meals on Wheels$40,000
South Plains Food Bank$40,000
Project Destiny$25,000
Lubbock Dream Center$25,000
Freedom in Jesus Ministries$25,000
Texas Boys Ranch$20,000
Morris Sheats Ministries$11,650
Individual grant recipient$10,000
American Center for Law and Justice$10,000
25-35 Water Ministries$10,000
Samaritian's Purse$10,000
One Voice Home-R2R Rescue$10,000
African Project Ministries I$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Culivate Ministries$1,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%One Voice Home: $10k → 17%Lubbock Dream Center: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 32 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
25

Total granted

$2.1M
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+117%

Still filing today

28%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $276k · revenue +46%
  • LM
    LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $276k · revenue +60%
  • FI
    Freedom in Jesus Ministries Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $227k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • R2
    Running 2 Rescue Lubbock
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • OV
    ONE VOICE HOME
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -32%
  • MW
    Majesty's Walk Inc Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lubbock Open Door

Our mission is to cultivate community, opportunity, and restoration with people experiencing poverty, homelessness, and sex trafficking.

Religion
2
Liberty Ministries

The ministry exists to serve offenders in prison and ex-offenders in the community by showing god's love, providing practical assistance, and supporting biblical standards of justice.

—
3
Liberty in Jesus Ministries

To engage in worship services as a christian church - twice a week prayer service - once a week. members and friends receive a deeper understanding of god and the holy bible. we minister to the poor, pray for the sick and counsel with…

—
4
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
5
Lifechangers Outreach

We are a 12-month residential Christian ministry for men and women ages 18 and up who have drug and alcohol addictions or other life controlling issues. We seek to help men and women overcome those life controlling issues.

Health
6
The Grace Message

The Grace Message exists to share the hope and encouragement found in the New Covenant message of Gods grace by helping people embrace the finished work of Christ, walk in their new identity, and enjoy freedom from lifeless religion.

Religion
7
Saint Benedict's Chapel Inc

Saint benedict's chapel is an ecumenical organization dedicated to serving lubbock's homeless, working poor, and food insecure. rooted in service to jesus christ, saint benedict's seeks to treat each guest with love and dignity.

Religion
8
Christ Life Ministries

Christ Life Ministries' vision is transforming lives for Christ through the preaching of the gospel and discipleship.

Religion
9
Lubbock Lutheran Retirement Corporation

To provide help, healing and hope in the name of jesus christ.

—
10
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
11
Lamb S House Ltd

Ministry that turns men from addiction to Jesus Christ by daily engaging them in spiritual, physical and financial guidance and goals

—
12
L I F E Ministries Inc Community Pregnancy Center

Our mission is to affirm life through evangelism, education, counseling and practical assistance.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lubbock Dream Center; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $175,000 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $155,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTrinity Church: $104,250 · OtherTrinity ChurchAmerican Center for Law and Justice: $95,000 · OtherAmerican Center for Law and JusticeOne Voice Home-R2R Rescue: $50,000 · OtherOne Voice Home-R2R RescueAfrican Project Ministries I: $40,500 · OtherProject Destiny: $35,000 · Other+40 more: $279,432 · Other+40 moreSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $276,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INCLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $276,000 · Food & NutritionLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INCFreedom in Jesus Ministries Inc: $226,625 · ReligionFreedom in Jesus Minis…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $190,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEHOPE COMMUNITY OF SHALOM: $15,000 · ReligionTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $196,000 · Human ServicesTEXAS GIRLS…LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER: $25,000 · Human ServicesLUBBOCK DRE…ONE VOICE HOME: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGRACE CAMPUS: $24,000 · Crime & Legal2535 WATER: $18,000 · Public BenefitCompassion International Incorporated: $1,620 · InternationalALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $25 · Civil Rights
Other$934,182Food & Nutrition$552,000Religion$431,625Human Services$232,000Crime & Legal$24,000Public Benefit$18,000International$1,620Civil Rights$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC: $276,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $276,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetFreedom in Jesus Ministries Inc: $226,625 over 8y, 18% of budgetTEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH: $196,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $190,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUBBOCK DREAM CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $21,000 over 7y, 6.0% of budget2535 WATER: $18,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetONE VOICE HOME: $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $1,620 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF LUBBOCK AND FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTH PLAINS FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Freedom in Jesus Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS GIRLS AND BOYS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds LUBBOCK DREAM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CAMPUS ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds 2535 WATER ↗
  • Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY OF SHALOM ↗
  • Who funds ONE VOICE HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of West TexasTX22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of West Texas · Diekemper Family Foundation Inc · HDS Foundation · Daji Foundation · Lubbock South Plains Lions Club · The Monty Miller Living Legacy Foundation · Kuykendall Foundation · Welborn-Payne Endowment Trust · South Plains Foundation · Rc Johnson Jr Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matthew 633 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matthew 633 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matthew 633’s filings →

    More from the funding graph