Skip to content

· Public charity

Matthew 25 Ministries Inc

The mission of Matthew 25: Ministries is to provide nutritional food to the hungry, clean water to the thirsty, clothing to the naked, affordable shelter to the homeless, medical care to the ill, and humanitarian supplies to those in need.

$295M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

International$445kEducation$41kFood & Nutrition$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $70,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $295,207,972 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $295,137,972 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$125M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The James Clinic$50,000
Foster Church$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Bread of Life Inc: $100k → 16%Sycamore Bridges: $10k → 16%Sycamore Bridges: $10k → 16%Neighborhood Bridges: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $89M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 6 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$48M · 54% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Russia and Neighboring States$35M · 39% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

South America$4.0M · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Middle East and North Africa$1.0M · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$693k · 1% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

South Asia$374k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Humanitarian Assistance

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

24%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 3 repeat orgs$378k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +466% since the first grant, against +109% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
16

Total granted

$121k
$308k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+466%
+109%

Still filing today

33%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalReligionFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BETH-EL FARM WORKER MINISTRY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k
  • NB
    NEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES
    3× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +466%
  • WH
    WALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $26k

Funded once

  • BO
    BREAD OF LIFE INCgraduated
    7× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +126%
  • M
    MIRACLEFEETgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $35k · revenue +151%
  • WH
    WALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mount Carmel Health System

We, mount carmel health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mount carmel health system is a member of trinity health.

—
2
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
3
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
4
Covenant HomeCare

Covenant HomeCare provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
5
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
6
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
7
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
8
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
9
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
10
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
11
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
12
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Samaritan Health Services; the most unlike its peers is 10 Star Trend Setters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

363 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
76
Early backer (in before they grew)
344/363
Grantees still filing
259/363
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETH-EL FARM WORKER MINISTRY: $65,000 · OtherBETH-EL FARM WORKER MINISTRYThe James Clinic: $50,000 · OtherThe James ClinicWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH: $26,000 · OtherWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCHWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,072 · OtherWALNUT HILLS BAPTIST CHURCHFoster Church: $20,000 · OtherFoster ChurchMontessori Open House: $15,000 · OtherMontessori Open HouseMontessori Open House: $15,000 · OtherMontessori Open HouseCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $10,000 · OtherCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES: $10,000 · OtherTOUCHING MOMENTS: $10,000 · OtherPleasant Green Missionary Baptist: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $6,000 · OtherBREAD OF LIFE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesBREAD OF LIFE INCNEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES: $30,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGESMIRACLEFEET: $35,285 · HealthMIRACLEFEE…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…The Childrens Hospital: $5,000 · HealthThe Childr…Payton's Lemonade Stand: $25,000 · PhilanthropyR-3 RESTORATIONS: $16,800 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS INDIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $13,000 · ReligionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY: $6,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$262,072Human Services$130,000Health$45,285Philanthropy$25,000Crime & Legal$16,800Religion$13,000Food & Nutrition$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIRACLEFEET: $35,285 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES: $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPayton's Lemonade Stand: $25,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetR-3 RESTORATIONS: $16,800 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetPARTNERS INDIA INTERNATIONAL INC: $13,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCOTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BREAD OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLEFEET ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD BRIDGES ↗
  • Who funds Payton's Lemonade Stand ↗
  • Who funds R-3 RESTORATIONS ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS INDIA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds COTA - Children's Organ Transplant Association ↗
  • Who funds CITY GOSPEL MISSION AND AFFILIATES ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Hospital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater CincinnatiOH46.1× affinity40 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Cincinnati · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Spaulding Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Freestore Foodbank Inc · Andrew Jergens Foundation · Millstone Fund · Tr Uw Jacob Schmidlapp #1 · Ruth J & Robert a Conway Foundation Inc · Charles H Dater Foundation Inc · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matthew 25 Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matthew 25 Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Matthew 25 Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Matthew 25 Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matthew 25 Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph