Skip to content
Matthew 19 14 at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Matthew 19 14

The mission of EMBRACE is to provide the opportunity for an inclusive education by supporting children with disabilities and learning differences in their Catholic schools.

$361k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.4MHealth$43kReligion$37k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $310,558, the rows itemized in this filing. The $361,349 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,791 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $275k
$12,666
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Our Lady of Unity Catholic School$38,000
Holy Trinity Catholic School$34,222
Ascension Catholic School$31,000
St Agnes Catholic School$29,564
Holy Trinity$19,222
Prince of Peace Catholic School$19,000
St Michael the Archangel Catholic School$15,000
Bishop Miege High School$12,666
Holy Cross Catholic School$12,666
Holy Family Catholic School$12,666
St Joseph Catholic School$12,666
St James Academy$12,666
Bishop Ward High School$12,666
Nativity Parish School$12,666
Queen of the Holy Rosary Wea$9,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 35% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Ascension Catholic School: $31k → 5%Sacred Heart Catholic School: $13k → 10%St Rose Philippine Duchesne: $13k → 14%Holy Family Catholic School: $19k → 14%St Joseph Catholic School: $19k → 15%St John the Evangelist Catholic School: $38k → 15%Bishop Ward High School: $32k → 16%Ascension Catholic School: $24k → 5%Holy Trinity: $19k → 7%Resurrection Catholic School: $20k → 16%Benedictine College: $77k → 15%Resurrection Catholic School: $20k → 16%John Paul II Catholic School: $17k → 5%Benedictine College: $47k → 15%Bishop Ward High School: $19k → 16%St Paul Catholic School: $19k → 16%St Michael the Archangel Catholic School: $50k → 5%Bishop Ward High School: $19k → 16%St Michael the Archangel Catholic School: $15k → 5%Bishop Ward High School: $19k → 16%St Michael the Archangel Catholic School: $14k → 5%Holy Spirit Catholic School: $32k → 5%Holy Spirit Catholic School: $19k → 5%Cure of Ars Catholic School: $38k → 5%Holy Spirit Catholic School: $19k → 5%Our Lady of Unity Catholic School: $38k → 16%Nativity Parish School: $20k → 5%Holy Trinity Catholic School: $34k → 5%Saint Paul Catholic School: $25k → 5%St Paul Catholic School: $19k → 5%Nativity Parish School: $19k → 5%St James Academy: $31k → 5%St James Academy: $30k → 5%St James Academy: $19k → 5%St Ann's Catholic School: $17k → 5%St James Academy: $18k → 5%St Agnes Catholic School: $38k → 5%St Agnes Catholic School: $35k → 5%Bishop Miege High School: $32k → 5%St Agnes Catholic School: $30k → 5%Bishop Miege High School: $19k → 5%Bishop Miege High School: $19k → 5%Bishop Miege High School: $19k → 5%St Agnes Catholic School: $18k → 5%Prince of Peace Catholic School: $19k → 5%Holy Cross Catholic School: $30k → 5%Holy Cross Catholic School: $19k → 5%Holy Cross Catholic School: $18k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 22 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$76k

Still filing today

5%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    St Agnes Catholic School
    5× · 2019–2025 · $127k
  • BC
    Benedictine College
    2× · 2021–2022 · $124k · revenue +54%
  • SJ
    ST JAMES ACADEMY
    5× · 2019–2025 · $111k

Funded once

  • CO
    CURE OF ARS CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $38k
  • SJ
    St John the Evangelist Catholic Church
    one grant, 2024 · $38k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

St Agnes Catholic School: $127,314 · OtherSt Agnes Catholic SchoolST JAMES ACADEMY: $111,416 · OtherST JAMES ACADEMYBISHOP WARD HIGH SCHOOL: $107,666 · OtherBISHOP WARD HIGH SCHOOLBISHOP MIEGE HIGH SCHOOL: $107,666 · OtherBISHOP MIEGE HIGH SCHOOLST MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL CATHOLIC CHURCH LEAWOOD: $87,667 · OtherST MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL CATHOLIC CHURCH LEAWOODHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $86,416 · OtherHOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCHST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $76,000 · OtherST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOLHoly Spirit Catholic Church: $69,667 · OtherNativity Parish School: $63,666 · OtherChurch of the Ascension: $54,500 · OtherRESURRECTION CATHOLIC SCHOOL AT THE CATHEDRAL: $51,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF UNITY PARISH: $45,500 · Other+14 more: $375,470 · Other+14 moreBenedictine College: $123,680 · EducationBenedicti…
Other$1,364,448Education$123,680

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBenedictine College: $123,680 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City C…Kansas Association of…United Way of Greater…Natl Christian Charit…Vanguard Charitable E…American Endowment Fo…Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO30.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matthew 19 14 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matthew 19 14. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Matthew 19 14?

    Find your warmest path to Matthew 19 14 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matthew 19 14’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home