Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mattaini Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$758k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.9MHealth$588kHuman Services$208kReligion$104kFood & Nutrition$58kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kEducation$4kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $146k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$36,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION$300,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH$100,000
ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOC$100,000
SOUND GENERATIONS$40,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$36,000
SALVATION ARMY$35,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UW MEDICINE MEMORY BRAIN WELLNESS$5,000
EISENHOWER MEDICAL FOUNDATION$5,000
UW FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOUND GENERATIONS: $40k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $5k → 9%SOUND GENERATIONS: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 21 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
16

Total granted

$2.9M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+24%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +40%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $151k · revenue +74%
  • NH
    NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM
    6× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • SS
    ST STEPHENS the MARTYR CATHOLIC CHU
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • H
    HOPELINKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +74%
  • UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
2
Seattle Children's Foundation

Seattle children's foundation exists to improve the quality of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents through contributions to organizations providing health care services, research and education.

—
3
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
4
Seattle Foundation

Seattle foundation's mission is to ignite powerful and rewarding philanthropy to make greater seattle a stronger, more vibrant community for all.

Philanthropy
5
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
6
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
7
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
8
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
9
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
10
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
11
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
12
Asante

Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Inland Empire Community Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION: $1,865,000 · OtherVIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATIONSALVATION ARMY: $128,000 · OtherFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $122,500 · Other+25 more: $325,950 · Other+25 moreALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $229,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DIS…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $151,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Health+4 more: $11,000 · HealthSOUND GENERATIONS: $50,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINK: $10,000 · Human ServicesUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $3,000 · Public BenefitUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationInland Empire Community Foundation: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$2,441,450Health$406,500Human Services$60,000Public Benefit$3,000Education$2,000Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $229,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $151,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $122,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUND GENERATIONS: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIC ONE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOPELINK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS: $3,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInland Empire Community Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST HARVEST EMM ↗
  • Who funds SOUND GENERATIONS ↗
  • Who funds MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Inland Empire Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Parkinsons Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mattaini Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mattaini Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mattaini Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph