How much did MATTAINI FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 98% of MATTAINI FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

eisenhower

2019

—

2020

—

2021

—

2022

research

2023

research

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k7 grants · $30k
$10k–50k6 grants · $90k

$7,500

Median grant

States reached

$665k

Total assets

Largest grants

ALZHEIMER'S ASSOC$25,000
ST JUDES RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
VIRGINIA MASON FOUNDATION$15,000
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
MEDIC ONE$10,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$7,500
SOUND GENERATIONS$5,000
EISENHOWER MEDICAL FOUNDATION$5,000
NORTHWEST HARVEST$5,000
PS PET FOOD BANK$3,000
VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS$2,500
USO$1,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.1M · 21 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +88% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.1M

$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+88%

+38%

Still filing today

24%

25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UG
UNION GOSPEL MISSION
6× · 2017–2024 · $43k · revenue +185%
MO
MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION
3× · 2017–2019 · $15k · revenue +46%
SG
SOUND GENERATIONS
2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +88%

Funded once

SS
ST STEPHENS the MARTYR CATHOLIC CHU
one grant, 2019 · $25k
H
HOPELINKgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +38%
UW
USO WORLD HEADQUARTERS
one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of

Easing the hardship of children's illness on families through programs that directly improve the health and wellbeing of children.

Health

Ronald McDonald House Charities of

Ronald mcdonald house of greater charlotte, inc. was organized for the purpose of providing a home for seriously ill children and their families while the children are receiving treatment at nearby medical facilities.

Human Services

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Midwest

To provide a "home away from home and support families seeking medical care for their children.

—

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities

To keep families close by providing resources for families of critically ill children.

Health

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the

See schedule o. ronald mcdonald house charities (rmhc) of the philadelphia region supports families on their children's medical journeys with a community of comfort and hope. we envision a world where every family can focus on their…

—

Ronald McDonald House Charities - Upper

Provide a supportive, caring community for families with seriously ill children.

Health

Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities (RMHC) of the Intermountain Area surrounds families with the support they need to be near and care for their seriously ill or injured children.

Health

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Kansas City Inc

The mission of ronald mcdonald house charities of kansas city is to reduce the burden of childhood illness on children and their families.

Health

Ronald McDonald House Charities of

To provide temporary housing for families of seriously ill children while receiving treatment.

Health

Easter Seals Massachusetts Inc

Easter seals massachusetts is a statewide community-based organization that has been helping people with disabilities to live full and independent lives for over 75 years. our mission is to provide services to ensure that children and…

Health

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of

We provide essential services that remove barriers, strenthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health

Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of

We house and support families so they can stay together and focus on their sick children.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northwest Parkinsons Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

9/9

Grantees still filing

8/9

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,109,450Health$25,000Human Services$21,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MATTAINI FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~18 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 916183158 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mattaini Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mattaini Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MATTAINI FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mattaini Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

MATTAINI FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mattaini Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph