· Private foundation
Massie Family Charitable Trust 1 Michael N Newmark Co-Trustee
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of MASSIE FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST 1 MICHAEL N NEWMARK CO-TRUSTEE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS | $3,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO CENTER FOR PSYCHOANAL | $1,500 |
| KQED | $1,000 |
| SMUIN BALLET | $1,000 |
| SEASON OF SHARING FUND | $1,000 |
| OAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS | $1,000 |
| ALAMEDA COUNTY FOOD BANK | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $800 |
| COMMUNITY CLEAN WATER INSTITUTE | $800 |
| PHILIPS RENNER FOUNDATION | $500 |
| OAKBRITE FOUNDATION | $500 |
| GLOBAL EXCHANGE | $500 |
| BERKLEY HOLIDAY FUND | $300 |
| OAKLAND HERITAGE ALLIANCE | $280 |
| POLE MOUNTAIN LOOKOU | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OSOAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS5× · 2021–2025 · $12k · revenue +51%
- SFSan Francisco Center for Psychoanal7× · 2019–2025 · $12k · revenue +13%
- CSCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND7× · 2019–2025 · $7k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- AFALLIANCE FOR ADV INFANT MENTAL HEALone grant, 2019 · $2k
- WBWASHINGTON BALTIMORE CENTERone grant, 2023 · $750
- HHHIP HOP FOR CHANGE INCone grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…
See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…
The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…
The museum's mission is to inspire all californians to create a more vibrant future for themselves and their communities. through collections, exhibitions, education programs, and public dialogue, we inspire people of all ages and…
Nurture empathy and connection by engaging communities with socially relevant contemporary art
The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…
The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Pete Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Center for Psychoanal ↗
- Who funds THE PETE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
- Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Smuin Ballet ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL EXCHANGE ↗
- Who funds SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Oakland Heritage Alliance ↗
- Who funds Amazon Watch Inc ↗
- Who funds Russian Riverkeeper ↗
- Who funds ESCUELA BILINGUE INTERNACIONAL ↗
- Who funds BERKELEY HOLIDAY FUND ↗
- Who funds Cazadero Performing Arts Family Camp ↗
- Who funds Joe Goode Performance Group ↗
- Who funds Pole Mountain Lookout Inc ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS RENNER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIP HOP FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds CCC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Human Migration Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds BERKELEY PARTNERS FOR PARKS ↗
- Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CONSUMER REPORTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Massie Family Charitable Trust 1 Michael N Newmark Co-Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Massie Family Charitable Trust 1 Michael N Newmark Co-Trustee?
Find your warmest path to Massie Family Charitable Trust 1 Michael N Newmark Co-Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.