· Private foundation
Maser Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $2k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WILDWOOD NATURE PRESERVE | $13,000 |
| FIRST PRESYTERIAN CHURCH | $1,000 |
| PRESBYTERIAN UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIS | $500 |
| DICKINSON COUNTY CONSERVATION BOARD | $150 |
| PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER | $75 |
| IOWA PBS | $35 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PLPEARSON LAKES ART CENTER5× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +30%
- CFCamp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc3× · 2017–2019 · $1k · revenue +22%
- OPOkoboji Protective Association3× · 2018–2023 · $700 · revenue +44%
Funded once
- LALAKES AREA DOG PARKone grant, 2018 · $5k
- BBLACKSTONEone grant, 2022 · $3k
- DUDucks Unlimited Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +99%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cultivate stewardship through environmental education and research, advocate for adequate funding of park programs and infrasturcture improvements, increase park users and improve the quality of vistor experiences in iowa parks.
To preserve and enhance the water and air quality of the iowa great lakes, situated in dickinson county, iowa, to protect the iowa great lakes from water and air pollution and related environmental concerns, to preserve the iowa great…
The corporation is organized primarily for the purpose of enhancing the human experience and quality of life through beautification of the iowa great lakes region by providing funding and development of enriching projects through…
Awareness among visitors and residents while fostering appreciation, preservation and conservation of the iowa great lakes regions unique culture, history, glacial geological formations, native species and natural habitats through…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc and the most unlike its peers is Okoboji Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WILDWOOD NATURE PRESERVE ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC ARNOLDS PARK INC ↗
- Who funds PEARSON LAKES ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds LE MARS ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc ↗
- Who funds TREES FOREVER INC ↗
- Who funds IOWA GREAT LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SPIRIT LAKE PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Okoboji Protective Association ↗
- Who funds LAKES REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · The Joseph Andres Family Foundation · Bedell World Citizenship Fund · Steve Pearson Foundation Inc · Peterson Family Foundation · The Quarry Fund · Anne Thorne Weaver Family Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Maser Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Maser Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Maser Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.