Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Smith Young Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$16kHuman Services$11kFood & Nutrition$9kReligion$9kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$3k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$146k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wabash Valley Health Center$2,500
Camp Navigate Inc$1,000
Providence Food Pantry$750
Terre Haute Area Meals on Wheels Inc$500
Remnant Church$500
St Joseph University Parish$500
The Salvation Army$500
Light House Mission Inc$500
14th & Chestnut Community Center$500
Covenant Cooperative Ministry$500
Western Indiana Community Action Agency$500
Wabash Valley Coalition$250
St Benedict Church$250
Union Health Foundation$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%Western Indiana Community Action Agency: $500 → 12%Western Indiana Community Action Agency: $500 → 12%Western Indiana Community Action Agency: $500 → 12%Western Indiana Community Action Agency: $500 → 12%Covenant Cooperative Ministry: $1k → 19%14th & Chestnut Community Center: $500 → 19%Covenant Cooperative Ministry: $500 → 19%Covenant Cooperative Ministry: $500 → 19%14th & Chestnut Community Center: $500 → 19%Covenant Cooperative Ministry: $500 → 19%14th & Chestnut Community Center: $500 → 19%14th & Chestnut Community Center: $250 → 19%Light House Mission Inc: $500 → 19%Light House Mission Inc: $500 → 19%Light House Mission Inc: $500 → 19%Light House Mission Inc: $500 → 19%Camp Navigate Inc: $1k → 19%Camp Navigate Inc: $1k → 19%Camp Navigate Inc: $1k → 19%The League of Terre Haute Inc: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$47k · 16 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$47k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+45%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    Wabash Valley Health Center Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +58%
  • CC
    Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +34%
  • CN
    Camp Navigate Inc
    3× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CW
    COVERED WITH LOVE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $800
  • JI
    JONAH INC
    one grant, 2021 · $700 · revenue +13%
  • LO
    League of Terre Haute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Meals On Wheels Association of Howard County Indiana Inc

Meals on Wheels of Howard County focuses on providing affordable or free meals to the shut-ins or medically recuperating residents of Howard County, Indiana. Meals on Wheels provides hot and cold meals that are healthy and affordable.…

—
2
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
3
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
4
Indy Hygiene Hub Inc

Provide free, high-quality personal care and hygiene items to individuals and families in need

Religion
5
Hoosier Outreach Inc the Hoosier Outreach Project
—
6
Bread of Life Community Food Pantry Inc

Provide food to disadvantaged families and individuals in Marshall County, Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
7
West Louisville Community Ministries Inc

Providing emergency assistance to needy individuals.

Human Services
8
Servants Heart of Indy Inc

The organization exist to provide assistance to needy individuals and families. assistance is provided thru a food pantry and the distributions of food, clothing, furniture & other household items to families with financial needs

Human Services
9
Providence Food Pantry of West Terre Haute Indiana Inc

To provide food to those in need in West Terre Haute, Indiana

—
10
Catholic Charities Tell City Inc

The mission of Catholic Charities Tell City is to work together as parish communities, fulfilling the call of the Gospel, and to help people improve their lives. We believe that through reaching out in service to those in need, by loving…

—
11
Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Indianapolis Interfaith Hospitality Network leverages the resources of houses of worship in the greater Indianapolis area to provide emergency shelter, food, case management, and aftercare services to families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
12
Laporte County Meals On Wheels Inc

Provide meals for shut-ins or indigent individuals of the community. volunteers deliver to clients monday thru friday.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light House Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Covenant Cooperative Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TERRE HAUTE AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $4,850 · OtherTERRE HAUTE AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INCCatholic Charities Terre Haute Inc: $4,100 · OtherCatholic Charities Terre Haute IncST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CHURCH TERRE HAUTE INC: $2,500 · OtherST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY CATHOLIC CHURCH TERRE HAUTE IN…Mental Health America in Vigo County Inc: $2,500 · OtherMental Health America in Vigo County IncSALVATION ARMY: $2,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSt Rose of Viterbo Fraternity: $2,000 · OtherSt Rose of Viterbo FraternityProvidence Food Pantry: $1,700 · OtherProvidence Food PantryCOVERED WITH LOVE INC: $800 · Other+5 more: $2,500 · Other+5 moreWabash Valley Health Center Inc: $12,500 · HealthWabash Valley Health Center I…UNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $500 · HealthCamp Navigate Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesCamp Navigate IncCOVENANT COOPERATIVE MINISTRY INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT COOPERATIVE MINIS…WESTERN INDIANA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesWESTERN INDIANA COMMUNITY …LIGHT HOUSE MISSION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesLIGHT HOUSE MISSION INC14th & Chestnut Community Center: $1,750 · Human Services14th & Chestnut Community …League of Terre Haute Inc: $500 · Human ServicesMANNA FROM SEVEN INC: $2,000 · Food & NutritionJONAH INC: $700 · Community Improvement
Other$22,950Health$13,000Human Services$11,750Food & Nutrition$2,000Community Improvement$700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWabash Valley Health Center Inc: $12,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTERRE HAUTE AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $4,850 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetCatholic Charities Terre Haute Inc: $4,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Navigate Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN INDIANA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT HOUSE MISSION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget14th & Chestnut Community Center: $1,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJONAH INC: $700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLeague of Terre Haute Inc: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wabash Valley Health Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds TERRE HAUTE AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Camp Navigate Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT COOPERATIVE MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN INDIANA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT HOUSE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FROM SEVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds 14th & Chestnut Community Center ↗
  • Who funds JONAH INC ↗
  • Who funds League of Terre Haute Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frederick R Benson TrustIN36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frederick R Benson Trust · Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust · Rose Ladies Aid Society · The Froderman Foundation Inc · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · The Hux Family Charitable Trust · Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Smith Young Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Smith Young Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Smith Young’s filings →

    More from the funding graph