· Private foundation
The Hux Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $148k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Union Health Foundation | $100,000 |
| Catholic Charities | $35,000 |
| 14th Chestnut Community Center | $25,000 |
| Big Mikes Community Center | $20,000 |
| Ivy Tech Foundation | $17,500 |
| St Joseph University Parish | $10,000 |
| reTHink Inc | $10,000 |
| Oceanview UMC St George Food Bank | $10,000 |
| Family Promise of Martin County | $10,000 |
| CROS Ministries | $10,000 |
| Team of Mercy | $8,000 |
| Terre Haute Economic Development | $5,000 |
| Camp Navigate | $3,000 |
| First Baptist Church of Terre Haute | $3,000 |
| Terre Haute Friendship House | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $87k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHanover College3× · 2020–2022 · $45k · revenue +62%
- ITIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC3× · 2021–2025 · $45k · revenue +34%
- RIreTHink Inc3× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +65%
Funded once
- SMSAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGEone grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +19%
- OUOCEANVIEW UNITED METHODIST CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $28k
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF NCPBCone grant, 2020 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.
The Arc of Vigo County is committed to providing advocacy, parent support and training, respite services for families who have a family member at home with a developmental disability, a supported employment service for persons with…
New Horizon Care Center is a non-profit treatment facility for inpatient and outpatient services, including: drugs, alcohol, and gambling. The organization's mission is to honor the dignity of all persons and provide tailored, nurturing…
Focus support for health, education and financial stability in grant county, indiana to achieve measurable results by uniting community resources.
The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.
Our continuing mission is to change the lives of those who suffer from alcohol and drug addiction.
To Develop and Provide resources for the purpose of assisting Low-Income Individuals through a variety of programs in Benton, Fountain, Montgomery, Parke, Vermillion, And Warren Counties in Indiana.
To enrich the lives of Tippecanoe County residents and visitors by collecting preserving researching and sharing our unique and diverse history
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
United Way improves lives by uniting the caring power of our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Next Step Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 28. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNION HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Hanover College ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds reTHink Inc ↗
- Who funds Camp Navigate Inc ↗
- Who funds HAMILTON CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Team of Mercy Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF MARTIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds The Green Turtle Cay Foundation ↗
- Who funds Christians Reaching Out To Society Inc ↗
- Who funds Next Step Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Wabash Valley Athletic Association Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · Indiana Chemical Trust Tr Ua-Fdt 320006018 · Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Frederick R Benson Trust · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · Rose Ladies Aid Society · The Weston Wabash Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc · Hulman & Company Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hux Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hux Family Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Hux Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.