How much did Mary Smith Young Trust grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of Mary Smith Young Trust’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500

Median grant

States reached

$166k

Total assets

Largest grants

Wabash Valley Health Center$2,000
Camp Navigate Inc$1,000
The Salvation Army$500
14th & Chestnut Community Center$500
Light House Mission Inc$500
Covenant Cooperative Ministry$500
St Rose of Viterbo Fraternity$500
St Joseph University Parish$500
Western Indiana Community Action Agency$500
Providence Food Pantry$500
Terre Haute Area Meals on Wheels Inc$500
St Benedict Church$250
Union Health Foundation$250

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 16%. 83% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$38k · 15 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$38k

$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%

+23%

Still filing today

53%

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WV
Wabash Valley Health Center
5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +54%
CC
Catholic Charities Terre Haute
4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +77%
CN
Camp Navigate Inc
2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +210%

Funded once

CW
Covered with Love Inc
one grant, 2020 · $800
JI
Jonah Inc
one grant, 2021 · $700 · revenue +23%
TL
The League of Terre Haute Inc
one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of the Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community…

Food & Nutrition

Meals On Wheels Association of Howard County Indiana Inc

Meals on Wheels of Howard County focuses on providing affordable or free meals to the shut-ins or medically recuperating residents of Howard County, Indiana. Meals on Wheels provides hot and cold meals that are healthy and affordable.…

—

Catholic Charities Tell City Inc

The mission of Catholic Charities Tell City is to work together as parish communities, fulfilling the call of the Gospel, and to help people improve their lives. We believe that through reaching out in service to those in need, by loving…

—

Lutheran Community Services Inc

Lutheran Community Services proclaims God's love to all people through word, service and action. It serves the community in many facets, including the following: A place to dispense and gather used clothing, food and furniture for the…

Human Services

West Louisville Community Ministries Inc

Providing emergency assistance to needy individuals.

Human Services

New Life Ministries - Indiana Inc

To serve those in need of food, shelter, and a purpose-filled life.

Food & Nutrition

Laporte County Meals On Wheels Inc

Provide meals for shut-ins or indigent individuals of the community. volunteers deliver to clients monday thru friday.

—

Providence Food Pantry of West Terre

To provide food to those in need in West Terre Haute, Indiana

—

Under the Bridge Ministries Inc

To serve the local homeless and unsheltered population with hot meals and recycled clothing every Sunday evening.

Human Services

Helping Hands Ministry

To help the community in which we live, by improving the quality of life for the elderly and disabled by providing free food.

Human Services

Manchester Fellowship of Churches Inc

Religious organization ministering to the emergency needs of the community such as food, clothing, utilities and housing.

Religion

Manna House Inc

Soup kitchen that serves the needy of our community weekdays at lunch with a hot meal and devotional time. There is one paid employee and lots of volunteers. Funding comes from are churches, businesses and individuals. We have organized…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light House Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Covenant Cooperative Ministry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

10/11

Grantees still filing

8/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$19,950Health$10,000Human Services$8,750Food & Nutrition$2,000Community Improvement$700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Frederick R Benson TrustIN26.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Frederick R Benson Trust · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · The George F and Marion D Johnson · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson · Duke Energy Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Mary Smith Young Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: The League of Terre Haute Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 356041516 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on The League of Terre Haute Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mary Smith Young Trust?

Find your warmest path to Mary Smith Young Trust through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Mary Smith Young Trust

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mary Smith Young Trust?

More from the funding graph

Mary Smith Young Trust

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mary Smith Young Trust?

More from the funding graph