· Private foundation
Rose Ladies Aid Society
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Manna From Seven | $9,000 |
| 14th & Chestnut Community Center | $8,100 |
| 20 needy households | $8,018 |
| Catholic Charities | $7,100 |
| Council on Domestic Abuse Inc | $3,600 |
| VNA & Hospice of the Wabash Valley | $3,600 |
| Happiness Bag | $3,600 |
| Mental Health America | $3,600 |
| Salvation Army | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,250 |
| St Joseph University Parish | $1,000 |
| Camp Navigate | $1,000 |
| Tribune Star Basket Fund | $1,000 |
| Chances and Services for Youth | $1,000 |
| Terre Haute Boys and Girls Club | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 19%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMANNA FROM SEVEN INC5× · 2021–2025 · $43k · revenue +14%
- 1C14th & Chestnut Community Center5× · 2021–2025 · $38k · revenue +30%
- COCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- 3N36 needy householdsone grant, 2024 · $11k
- RGRio Grande Elementary Schoolone grant, 2024 · $137
- SSSheldon Swope Art Museum Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $100 · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education & Museum Operations
To provide a child-oriented, multidisciplinary forensice interview enviroment facility and counseling center for victims of abuse and their families.
Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…
To promote Christian child care and foster care networks in developing nations
Seeking to put God's love into action,
To advocate for the rights and interests of children in Southwestern Indiana.
To provide low-cost housing to eligible families.
The House of Hope is dedicated to serving individuals, families, and our community by providing a hand up into a hope-filled future.
CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.
Seeking to put gods love into action, Habitat for Humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.
Build or rehabilitate homes for low income families to purchase at cost on interest free mortgages
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light House Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is Next Step Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MANNA FROM SEVEN INC ↗
- Who funds 14th & Chestnut Community Center ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds Vigo County Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Terre Haute Boys & Girls Club ↗
- Who funds Camp Navigate Inc ↗
- Who funds LIGHT HOUSE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds The Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Wabash Valley Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds CHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Next Step Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Sheldon Swope Art Museum Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Frederick R Benson Trust · Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Indiana Chemical Trust Tr Ua-Fdt 320006018 · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · The Hux Family Charitable Trust · The Weston Wabash Foundation · Mary Smith Young Trust · Hulman & Company Foundation Inc · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust · Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rose Ladies Aid Society funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rose Ladies Aid Society?
Find your warmest path to Rose Ladies Aid Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.