Skip to content
Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc

Mary's center embraces all communities and provides high-quality healthcare, education, and social services to build better futures.

$143k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$20MEducation$2.3MHealth$884kPhilanthropy$111k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $98,035, the rows itemized in this filing. The $142,534 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,499 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$24,413
Median grant
1
States reached
$43M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PG COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES$54,667
KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS$24,413
EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL$13,429
INGENUITY PREP$5,526
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTER INC: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

14%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 5 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$3.2M
$20M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+66%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BRIYA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $1.8M · revenue +46%
  • CASA INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $523k · revenue +194%
  • EL
    EUPHEMIA L HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $501k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • MC
    MC2 Community Development Corporation
    one grant, 2017 · $20M · revenue -93% · 99% of their budget
  • BF
    BAINUM FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $103k · revenue -61%
  • HT
    HEART TO HAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $61k · revenue +244%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educare Dc

Educare dc's mission is to eliminate the opportunity gap for young children living in poverty and give them the skills necessary for success in kindergarten and beyond. we work at the intersection of practice, policy, and research to…

Human Services
2
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
3
Dc Bilingual Public Charter School

The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.

Education
4
Community College Preparatory Academy Public Charter School

The mission of the community college preparatory academy public charter school is to provide the education and skills development to empower and prepare under-credited adults for postsecondary educational success, viable employment and…

Education
5
Early Childhood Academy Public Charter School

It is the mission of early childhood academy public charter school to foster the academic and social/emotional growth and development of each student in a safe and holistic learning environment that will equip all students with the…

Education
6
Harmony Dc Public Charter Schools

The mission of the charter school is to prepare students for higher learning in a safe, caring, and collaborative atmosphere through a quality learner-centered educational program with a strong emphasis on science, technology, engineering,…

Education
7
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
8
Multicultural Career Intern Program

The mission of mcip and its public school affiliate, chec, is to strive to become a model professional learning community that respects and responds to the diverse needs of our underserved students by preparing them for the acasemic rigors…

—
9
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
10
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
11
The Family Place Public Charter School

The mission of the family place public charter school is to improve the literacy and workplace skills of low-income limited english proficient adults in the district so that they and their family are self-sustaining, employable and engaged…

Education
12
Creative Minds International Public Charter School

The mission of the charter school is to cultivate within all of our students the mindset, skills, creativity, and commitment to equity essential in becoming globally aware and independently minded citizens.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kipp Dc Public Charter Schools; the most unlike its peers is The J Willard and Alice S Marriott Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MC2 Community Development Corporation: $19,600,000 · HealthMC2 Community Development Corporation+3 more: $101,758 · HealthBRIYA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,806,055 · EducationBRIYA PUBLI…EUPHEMIA L HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $501,482 · EducationEUPHEMIA L …+2 more: $29,939 · EducationCASA INC: $523,179 · OtherCHILDRENS NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $204,731 · OtherPRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS: $194,611 · OtherBAINUM FAMILY FOUNDATION: $102,706 · PhilanthropyTHE J WILLARD AND ALICE S MARRIOTT FOUNDATION: $8,075 · PhilanthropyPRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTERINC: $10,804 · Human Services
Health$19,701,758Education$2,337,476Other$922,521Philanthropy$110,781Human Services$10,804

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMC2 Community Development Corporation: $19,600,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetBRIYA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $1,806,055 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetCASA INC: $523,179 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetEUPHEMIA L HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $501,482 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBAINUM FAMILY FOUNDATION: $102,706 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEART TO HAND INC: $60,610 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $28,703 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $24,413 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND INC: $12,445 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE J WILLARD AND ALICE S MARRIOTT FOUNDATION: $8,075 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINGENUITY PREP: $5,526 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Co…The Morris and Gwendo…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Greater Washington Community FoundationDC18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc: 17% of income from government
  • Community Clinic Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Heart to Hand Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Casa Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $55k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home