Loading…
· Public charity
Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc
Mary's center embraces all communities and provides high-quality healthcare, education, and social services to build better futures.
$143k
Granted FY2024
4
Grants
1
Communities
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$20MEducation$2.3MPhilanthropy$111kHuman Services$11kOther$923k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
health insurance
2019
health insurance
2020
health insurance
2021
health insurance
2022
health insurance
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 4 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$24,413
Median grant
1
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
- PG COUNTY DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES$54,667
- KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS$24,413
- EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL$13,429
- INGENUITY PREP$5,526
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 5 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
7
Total granted
$3.2M
$20M
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+57%
+63%
Still filing today
60%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BPBRIYA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS3× · 2020–2022 · $1.8M · revenue +57%
CASA DE MARYLAND INC6× · 2017–2022 · $523k · revenue +139%- EHEL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $501k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- MCMC2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONone grant, 2017 · $20M · revenue -93% · 99% of their budget
- BFBainum Family Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $103k · revenue +61%
- HTHEART TO HAND INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $61k · revenue +244%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Marin Community Clinic
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
Health
2
Community Medical Center
Strive to make better health easier by providing access to affordable, high quality health services through equitable, innovative, and inclusive care models that support patient care, education, research, & community service.
Health
3
Community Medical Center
Hospital serving ocean county and is committed to enhancing the overall health status of the community by providing the highest quality healthcare and related services.
Health
4
People's Community Clinic Foundation
People's community clinic foundation shall be operated exclusively to support the mission of people's community clinic, inc., an exempt organization.
Health
5
Family Care Health Centers
During the year family care health centers provided services to approximately 16,734 patients. approximately 7,868 were under 100% of federal poverty.
Health
6
Council of Community Clinics
A premier consortium of primary health care organizations, hcp is an advocate for its members who serve the health needs of communities throughout southern california, providing them with the voice and power to serve vulnerable populations.
—
7
People's Community Clinic Inc
People's community clinic's (people's) most significant activity in 2023 was opening its seven operatory dental suite. the expanded dental program has been a resounding success and dental visits have increased by 100% from 3,052 in 2022 to…
Health
8
Baim Institute for Clinical
To engage in and facilitate scientific and medical research.
Health
9
Marian Clinic Inc
We reveal and foster god's healing love by improving the health of thepeople and communities we serve, especially those who are poor andvulnerable.
—
10
Community Clinics Health Network
Hqp offers an array of programs that promote access to and improve the quality of services provided by our member health centers to the communities they serve.
Health
11
Mary Washington Healthcare
Our mission is to improve the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Health
12
Bay Clinic Inc
Community - directed healthcare organization that provides quality primary and preventive care.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Primary Care Coalition of and the most unlike its peers is J Willard and Alice S Marriott Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$19,701,758Education$2,337,476Other$922,521Philanthropy$110,781Human Services$10,804
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MC2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BRIYA PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds CASA DE MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds EL HAYNES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Bainum Family Foundation ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HAND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds PRIMARY CARE COALITION OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PRINCE GEORGE'S CHILD RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds J Willard and Alice S Marriott Foundation ↗
- Who funds INGENUITY PREP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Greater Washington Community FoundationDC17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Heart to Hand Inc — 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MC2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 273306298 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on MC2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 99% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines