Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$479k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$774kHealth$699kAnimals$368kCrime & Legal$130kInternational$125kEducation$90kCivil Rights$60kRecreation & Sports$37kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $161k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $889k
  • $250k+1 grant · $479k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEMCAC$479,337
ALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY GRANT #2$138,700
WAYSIDE RECOVERY GRANT #1$100,000
ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #1$100,000
TUBMAN GRANT #2$100,000
SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT #1$90,000
THE POWER OF PEOPLE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$60,000
SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT #2$50,000
TUBMAN GRANT #3$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$50,000
WAYSIDE RECOVERY GRANT #2$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD-NORTH CENTRAL STATES$50,000
ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #2$50,000
ALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY GRANT #1$31,433
ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #4$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $574k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SEMCAC: $479k → 8%THE POWER OF PEOPLE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $60k → 11%THE POWER OF PEOPLE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%HELPING PAWS: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 80% of the giving stays in MN; by stated purpose, 73%.

Mary Ruth Weisel Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$708k · 6 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$708k
$175k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $125k · revenue +13%
  • WR
    WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $125k · revenue +0%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • AF
    ALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • Physicians Committee for Responsible Med
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +8%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +19%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
2
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
5
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
6
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
7
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Wake County Inc

Located in raleigh, nc, the spca of wake county works in over half the state of north carolina through collaborative partnerships that save pets and help people. significant activities include: decreasing the number of animals entering…

Animals
8
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
9
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
10
Paws - Preservation of Animal Welfare & Safety Inc

The organization is a no-kill animal rescue. paws saves lives and prevents suffering by implementing the no-kill philosophy through aggressive spay/neuter programs for owned and unowned animals. this is accomplished by rescuing, fostering,…

Animals
11
Spay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc

To prevent the suffering and death of companion animals and to enrich the human-animal bond by providing excellent, accessible, and affordable spay/neuter and veterinary care.

Animals
12
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Beyond the Dance Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY GRANT #2: $138,700 · OtherALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY GRANT #2WAYSIDE RECOVERY GRANT #1: $100,000 · OtherWAYSIDE RECOVERY GRANT #1ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #1: $100,000 · OtherADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #1TUBMAN GRANT #2: $100,000 · OtherTUBMAN GRANT #2SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT #1: $90,000 · OtherSENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT #1TUBMAN GRANT #3: $50,000 · OtherTUBMAN GRANT #3ADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #2: $50,000 · OtherADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #2ALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY: $50,000 · OtherALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNYSENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT #2: $50,000 · OtherSENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT #2WAYSIDE RECOVERY GRANT #2: $50,000 · OtherWAYSIDE RECOVERY GRANT #2ALLINA FOUNDATIONCOURAGE KENNY GRANT #1: $31,433 · OtherADVOCATES FOR HUMAN RIGHTS GRANT #4: $30,000 · Other+6 more: $43,500 · OtherSEMCAC: $479,337 · Human ServicesSEMCACPOWER OF PEOPLE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $85,000 · Human ServicesPOWER OF PEOPLE LEADERSHIP I…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesHOWLING FOR WOLVES: $150,000 · AnimalsHOWLING FOR WOLVE…WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $125,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE REHABILI…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $40,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCI…Humane World for Animals Inc: $25,000 · AnimalsHumane World for …+2 more: $18,000 · AnimalsPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOO…PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $100,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOO…Physicians Committee for Responsible Med: $50,000 · HealthPhysicians Commit…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 · InternationalBEYOND THE DANCE NETWORK: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$883,633Human Services$574,337Animals$358,000Health$350,000International$125,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEMCAC: $479,337 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOWLING FOR WOLVES: $150,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $125,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPOWER OF PEOPLE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $85,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAMORE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHELPING PAWS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE HAVEN PET SANCTUARY INC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEMCAC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOWLING FOR WOLVES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL STATES ↗
  • Who funds POWER OF PEOPLE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Physicians Committee for Responsible Med ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds EQUAMORE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HELPING PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE DANCE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HAVEN PET SANCTUARY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Equamore Foundation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Ruth Weisel’s filings →

More from the funding graph