Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
26
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
57%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$479,337
Organizations funded a year
5 to 7
FY2022 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$12M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 57% of the organizations Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 47% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
AnimalsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving25$1.5M84%
FY20247$238k57%
FY20235$300k40%
FY20225$215kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$774kHealth$699kAnimals$368kCrime & Legal$130kInternational$125kEducation$90kCivil Rights$60kRecreation & Sports$37kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 14 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 18 recipients with no EIN on record ($884k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSemcac: $479,337 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Federation of America Inc: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHowling for Wolves: $150,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $125,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Rehabilitation Center of Minnesota: $125,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetPlanned Parenthood North Central States: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPower of People Leadership Institute: $85,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEquamore Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHelping Paws Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSafe Haven Pet Sanctuary Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation with peer funders

About Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation

How much does Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation give?
Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation reported 26 grants totaling $1,547,970 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 7 organizations a year over FY2022 to FY2024.
What does Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (34%), Health (30%), Animals (16%).
Who are Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2025: Semcac ($479k), Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc ($200k), Howling for Wolves ($150k).
Does Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 57% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Minneapolis Foundation, Mightycause Charitable Foundation, Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation.
Where is Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation based?
Mary Ruth Weisel Foundation is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Ruth Weisel’s filings →

More from the funding graph