Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Hobbs Griffith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$485kFood & Nutrition$434kEnvironment$304kEducation$239kPublic Safety & Disaster$238kHealth$180kReligion$172kAnimals$108kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $308k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN PATRICIO AND ARANSAS COUNTIES A & H SHOW INC$40,000
SKIDMORE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$27,500
SHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION$25,000
SOUND OFF INC$25,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$20,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA$20,000
PAPALOTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$17,500
BEEVILLE ART ASSOCIATION INC$15,000
CATHOLIC MUSIC INITIATIVE INC$15,000
SINTON TX HISTORICAL MUSEUM$12,500
BRACKENRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE CIBOLO WILDERNESS$10,000
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION OF PORT ARANSAS: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CA
NM
TN
SC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of Mary Hobbs Griffith Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 69%.

Mary Hobbs Griffith Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 18% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 35 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
16

Total granted

$2.2M
$95k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+28%

Still filing today

54%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $53k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BEEVILLE ART ASSOCIATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $140k · revenue +13% · 39% of their budget
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +78%
  • SO
    SOUND OFF
    3× · 2023–2025 · $68k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • JD
    James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • YD
    Youth Development Foundation of Port Aransasgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +28%
  • TH
    THE HEALER WITHIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kimbell Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum

We inspire people to live in harmony with the natural world by fostering love, appreciation, and understanding of the sonoran desert.

Arts & Culture
3
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
4
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
5
Texas Prairieland Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Port Aransas Conservancy Fund
Environment
7
San Antonio Museum of Art

The San Antonio Museum of Art brings people together with art by collecting, preserving, and presenting significant works of art representing a broad range of history and cultures, advancing human connection and understanding, and…

Arts & Culture
8
San Antonio Conservation Society Foundation

To preserve and to encourage the preservation of historic buildings, objects, places and customs relating to the history of texas, its natural beauty and all that is admirably distinctive to texas; and by such physical and cultural…

Arts & Culture
9
The Tobin Theatre Arts Fund
Arts & Culture
10
Texas State Aquarium Association

The texas state aquarium's mission is engaging people with animals, inspiring appreciation for our seas, and supporting wildlife conservation. its vision is to be a global leader in fostering support for the conservation of the gulf of…

Animals
11
Houston Geological Society Foundation
—
12
San Antonio Conservation Society

To preserve and to encourage the preservation of historic buildings, objects, places and customs relating to the history of texas, its natural beauty and all that is admirably distinctive to texas; and by such physical and cultural…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Botanical Garden Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Beeville Art Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
17/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN PATRICIO AND ARANSAS COUNTIES A & H SHOW INC: $360,000 · OtherSAN PATRICIO AND ARANSAS COUNTIES A & H SHOW INCFRIENDS OF THE CIBOLO WILDERNESS: $163,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CIBOLO WILDERNESSSKIDMORE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $117,500 · OtherSKIDMORE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTPAPALOTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $112,500 · OtherPAPALOTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $95,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCHSINTON FFA ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $93,750 · OtherSINTON FFA ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONTAFT PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $82,500 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $80,000 · OtherSKIDMORE HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $62,000 · OtherFUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA BARNESVILLE MN ALUMNI AS: $60,000 · Other+27 more: $393,500 · Other+27 moreBEEVILLE ART ASSOCIATION INC: $140,000 · Arts & CultureBEEVILLE ART…GILLESPIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureGILLESPIE CO…Port Aransas Preservation and Historical Association: $40,000 · Arts & CulturePort Aransas…James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts: $25,000 · Arts & CultureJames Dick F…+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN: $60,000 · EnvironmentSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentSHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION SHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EnvironmentFriends of the ARK Inc: $60,000 · AnimalsSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 · Animals+1 more: $3,000 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 · HealthTHE HEALER WITHIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthDriscoll Children's Hospital: $5,000 · HealthPORT ARANSAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationSOUND OFF: $68,000 · Public Benefit
Other$1,620,250Arts & Culture$260,000Environment$115,000Animals$103,000Health$85,000Education$70,000Public Benefit$68,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEEVILLE ART ASSOCIATION INC: $140,000 over 9y, 39% of budgetPAPALOTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $112,500 over 9y, 37% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND OFF: $68,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetFUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA BARNESVILLE MN ALUMNI AS: $60,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetFriends of the ARK Inc: $60,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetSANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN: $60,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetGILLESPIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPort Aransas Preservation and Historical Association: $40,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPORT ARANSAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDWOMENWORK: $36,500 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetIBU Foundation: $33,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetSAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJames Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts: $25,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION SHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEALER WITHIN FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAdore Ministries Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDriscoll Children's Hospital: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGIO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEEVILLE ART ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAPALOTE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUND OFF ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA BARNESVILLE MN ALUMNI AS ↗
  • Who funds Friends of the ARK Inc ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds GILLESPIE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Port Aransas Preservation and Historical Association ↗
  • Who funds PORT ARANSAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WORLDWOMENWORK ↗
  • Who funds IBU Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO BOTANICAL GARDEN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds James Dick Foundation for the Performing Arts ↗
  • Who funds SHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION SHADES OF GREEN LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MUSIC INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Development Foundation of Port Aransas ↗
  • Who funds THE HEALER WITHIN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Adore Ministries Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Coastal Bend Community FoundationTX15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Coastal Bend Community Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · San Antonio Area Foundation · Texas Sandfest · Mays Family Foundation · Ed Rachal Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Hobbs Griffith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Hobbs Griffith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Hobbs Griffith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph