Skip to content
Mary H Storer Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mary H Storer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.0MYouth Development$1.0MHuman Services$853kRecreation & Sports$842kAnimals$746kEnvironment$695kArts & Culture$667kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $510k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $390k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$375,000
COWTOWN SKATE$100,000
THE JOY BUS$90,000
WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING$75,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA$75,000
MAX HIGBEE CENTER$50,000
WAISN$40,000
ROAD2HOME$40,000
TWISPWORKS FOUNDATION$40,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEYENNE INC$30,000
FRIDAY FOOD BAG FOUNDATION$30,000
K9S 4 MOBILITY$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION$30,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CHEYENNE$30,000
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NATIVE AMERICAN ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION: $35k → 15%SISTERS UNITED: $25k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $75k → 17%COOS FOOD CUPBOARD: $15k → 17%CAN'D AID: $10k → 12%UNITED CHURCH HOMES: $20k → 17%PEPPERMINT RIDGE: $50k → 11%PEPPERMINT RIDGE: $20k → 11%PEPPERMINT RIDGE: $15k → 11%STORE TO DOOR: $30k → 12%LARAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $50k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $25k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $25k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $20k → 10%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $100k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $100k → 11%WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $75k → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $20k → 10%WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $75k → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $20k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $15k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $15k → 10%CLIMB WYOMING: $10k → 10%NORTH WEST YOUTH SERVICES: $30k → 12%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $30k → 10%WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $30k → 12%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BELLINGHAM: $25k → 12%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $30k → 10%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $20k → 10%BLUE SKIES FOR CHILDREN: $20k → 12%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $20k → 10%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $20k → 12%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $20k → 10%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $20k → 10%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $20k → 10%OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $20k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHEYENNE WYOMING INC: $15k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHEYENNE WYOMING INC: $15k → 10%K9S 4 MOBILITY: $10k → 10%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHEYENNE WYOMING INC: $10k → 10%WHATCOM FAMILY YMCA: $15k → 12%BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHEYENNE WYOMING INC: $10k → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
WI
MI
NY
OR
WY
SD
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 56 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

56 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
117

Total granted

$5.8M
$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+21%

Still filing today

84%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $220k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    Boys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County
    5× · 2018–2023 · $525k · revenue +177%
  • CS
    COWTOWN SKATE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $350k · revenue +134% · 32% of their budget
  • CF
    CHEYENNE FRONTIER DAYS OLD WEST MUSEUM
    8× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • CM
    CORBET MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $215k
  • K
    KENYARELIEFORG
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue -21%
  • TB
    THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
2
Washington Wildlife & Recreation Coalition

Creating a greener, healthier, more equitable, and better Washington for all through community outreach, network building, and advocacy for conservation and outdoor recreation funding.

—
3
Washington Wild

Washington wild protects and restores wild lands and waters in washington state through advocacy, education and civic engagement.

Animals
4
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
5
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Wenatchee Valley Tread

We collaborate with diverse partners to drive sustainable outdoor recreation initiatives in north central washington. tread is committed to protecting and sustaining north central washington's outdoor spaces so future generations can…

Recreation & Sports
8
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
9
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
10
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
11
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
12
Whatcom Mountain Bike Coalition

Whatcom Mountain Bike Coalition's (WMBC) mission is to preserve and enhance non-motorized trail access in Whatcom County through stewardship, education and advocacy.WMBC is a federal non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. We work with many…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Common Threads Farm; the most unlike its peers is Pedal Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

138 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 138 of the 184 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
131/138
Grantees still filing
97/138
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MT BAKER PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $250,000 · OtherCORBET MEDICAL CENTER: $215,000 · OtherMAX HIGBEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER: $200,000 · OtherWHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $375,000 · OtherWHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+119 more: $4,579,000 · Other+119 moreHospice of the Valley: $200,000 · Human ServicesHospice of the…WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $180,000 · Human ServicesWHATCOM COUNCI…K9'S 4 MOBILITY INC: $170,000 · Human ServicesK9'S 4 MOBILIT…CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $150,000 · Human ServicesCLIMB DBA CLIM…PEPPERMINT RIDGE: $85,000 · Human ServicesPEPPERMINT RID…THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALL…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST WYOMING INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesLARAMIE COUNTY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $50,000 · Human Services+11 more: $275,000 · Human Services+11 moreCOWTOWN SKATE: $350,000 · Recreation & SportsBandon Community Youth Center Inc: $60,000 · Recreation & SportsBellingham Bay Community Boating Center: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsCAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsHarpers Playground: $45,000 · Recreation & SportsThe AIROW Project: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsBRIDGE TO SKATE: $30,000 · Recreation & Sports+3 more: $57,000 · Recreation & SportsBoys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County: $525,490 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentSKATE4LIFE: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE JOY BUS: $190,000 · Food & NutritionFRIDAY FOOD BAG FOUNDATION: $185,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEYENNE INC: $135,000 · Food & NutritionAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $50,000 · Food & NutritionKITCHEN ON THE STREET INC: $30,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $40,000 · Food & NutritionCHEYENNE FRONTIER DAYS OLD WEST MUSEUM: $240,000 · Arts & CulturePICKFORD FILM CENTER: $115,000 · Arts & CultureCHEYENNE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM FKA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CHEYENNE: $100,000 · Arts & CultureKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $55,000 · Arts & CultureTWISPWORKS FOUNDATION: $40,000 · Arts & CultureNELSON MUSEUM OF THE WEST: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN HOSPITALITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationCEDAR TREE MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $65,000 · EducationWILD WHATCOM: $55,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationBIRMINGHAM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $45,000 · EducationCOMMON THREADS FARM: $40,000 · EducationWind & Oar Boat School: $40,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education+3 more: $36,000 · Education
Other$5,619,000Human Services$1,235,000Recreation & Sports$677,000Youth Development$650,490Food & Nutrition$630,000Arts & Culture$625,000Education$491,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County: $525,490 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetWHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $375,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCOWTOWN SKATE: $350,000 over 6y, 32% of budgetMT BAKER PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $250,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCHEYENNE FRONTIER DAYS OLD WEST MUSEUM: $240,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAX HIGBEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER: $200,000 over 4y, 7.9% of budgetTHE JOY BUS: $190,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFRIDAY FOOD BAG FOUNDATION: $185,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetWHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING: $180,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetK9'S 4 MOBILITY INC: $170,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING: $150,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEYENNE INC: $135,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCOMEA INC: $130,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetUNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE: $130,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetFERNDALE FOOD BANK: $130,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetPICKFORD FILM CENTER: $115,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCanine Angels Service Teams: $105,000 over 4y, 22% of budgetCHEYENNE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM FKA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CHEYENNE: $100,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetCARE4Paws Inc: $95,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetROAD2HOME: $90,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetFAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS: $90,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetPEPPERMINT RIDGE: $85,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMICHIGAN HOSPITALITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetOKANOGAN LAND TRUST: $75,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA: $75,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWHATCOM MILLION TREES PROJECT: $75,000 over 1y, 92% of budgetWHATCOM LAND TRUST: $70,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCHEYENNE FRONTIER DAYS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetCEDAR TREE MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $65,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetBandon Community Youth Center Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetRE SOURCES: $60,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetKUOW PUGET SOUND PUBLIC RADIO: $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILD WHATCOM: $55,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetKULSHAN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST: $50,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetBellingham Bay Community Boating Center: $50,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTHEAST WYOMING INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPINK FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetWHATCOM HUMANE SOCIETY: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLummi Island Heritage Trust: $50,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPLATTE VALLEY HEALTHCARE PROJECT: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSKATE4LIFE: $50,000 over 3y, 89% of budgetAlternatives to Hunger Bellingham Food Bank: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Whatcom County ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COWTOWN SKATE ↗
  • Who funds MT BAKER PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
  • Who funds CHEYENNE FRONTIER DAYS OLD WEST MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
  • Who funds MAX HIGBEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE JOY BUS ↗
  • Who funds FRIDAY FOOD BAG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds K9'S 4 MOBILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds KENYARELIEFORG ↗
  • Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CHEYENNE INC ↗
  • Who funds COMEA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FERNDALE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds PICKFORD FILM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Canine Angels Service Teams ↗
  • Who funds CHEYENNE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM FKA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CHEYENNE ↗
  • Who funds CARE4Paws Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROAD2HOME ↗
  • Who funds FAR CONSERVATORY OF THERAPEUTIC AND PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERMINT RIDGE ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HOSPITALITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OKANOGAN LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM MILLION TREES PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WHATCOM LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CHEYENNE FRONTIER DAYS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR TREE MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Whatcom Community Fou…First Fed FoundationMount Baker FoundationPuget Sound Energy Fo…Chuckanut Health Foun…The Norcliffe Foundat…Jerry H Walton Founda…Riverstyx FoundationNorth Sound Accountab…The Albertsons Compan…PeaceHealthMedina Foundation
Whatcom Community FoundationWA64.1× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Whatcom Community Foundation · First Fed Foundation · Mount Baker Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Chuckanut Health Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Jerry H Walton Foundation · Riverstyx Foundation · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · PeaceHealth · Medina Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary H Storer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary H Storer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 17%
  • Friends of Trees: 100% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • The Freshwater Trust: 17% of income from government
  • Bandon Community Youth Center Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Pear: 1% of income from government
  • Asante: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary H Storer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mary H Storer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 184 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary H Storer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home