· Public charity
Chuckanut Health Foundation
To further charitable, scientific and educational activities that strengthen and advance individual and community health in whatcom county.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 20 grants below total $390,040 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $524,471 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $134,431 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $294k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SKOOKUM KIDS | $65,200 |
| VAMOS OUTDOORS PROJECT | $45,000 |
| NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES | $32,700 |
| BELLINGHAM BAY ROTARY FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| NAMI OF WHATCOM COUNTY | $25,000 |
| WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $24,000 |
| CASCADE MEDICAL ADVANTAGE | $20,750 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHATCOM COUNTY | $20,000 |
| HEALTH MINISTRIES NETWORK | $17,500 |
| DEMENTIA SUPPORT NORTHWEST | $15,000 |
| CASCADIA INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FILM FESTIVAL | $15,000 |
| FERNDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $14,750 |
| WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $14,340 |
| OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| MOUNT BAKER THEATER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $662k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $181k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LPLYDIA PLACE4× · 2017–2022 · $191k · revenue +143%
- NYNORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES5× · 2017–2024 · $188k · revenue +157%
- UCUNITY CARE NORTHWEST3× · 2017–2021 · $179k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- KKKornerstone Kids PSone grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue -103%
- LFLHAQ'TEMISH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -7%
- TBTHE BELLINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $35k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
United way of snohomish county improves lives for families in snohomish county by bringing people, resources, and strategy together.
Whatcom Mountain Bike Coalition's (WMBC) mission is to preserve and enhance non-motorized trail access in Whatcom County through stewardship, education and advocacy.WMBC is a federal non-profit 501(c)(3) organization. We work with many…
The mission of the Whatcom Land Trust is to preserve and protect wildlife habitat, scenic, agricultural and open space lands in Whatcom County for future generations by securing interests in land and promoting land stewardship.
Trade association dedicated to providing educational opportunities, legal and regulatory advice, quality compliance assistance, lobbying and discounted group member benefits for long-term care facilities.
Washington Indian Civil Rights Commission is led by and for Indigenous people, and envisions a just society in which we are treated with honor, fairness and respect. Our mission is to uphold our individual civil rights through education…
To sustain and enrich our community through the arts.
Futurewise works throughout Washington state to encourage healthy, equitable and opportunity-rich communities, and to protect our most valuable farmlands, forests and water resources through wise land use policies and practices.
Provide a safe, healing, and restorative community that empowers long-term transformation through human connection for those recovering from the trauma of homelessness, addictions, and mental health challenges.
CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.
The whatcom sports commission is committed to develop and maintain athletic facilities of the highest standards for the benefit of the citizens of whatcom county.
Project Access Northwest provides low-income families access to medical, dental and Behavioral Health care so they can live a healthier and more productive life.
Improving the quality of life for the people in the Olympic Peninsula Community by providing increased access to health and wellness services for the underserved
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whatcom Council On Aging and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LYDIA PLACE ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UNITY CARE NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds Skookum Kids ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM DISPUTE RESOLUTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds ANIMALS AS NATURAL THERAPY ↗
- Who funds OUR TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Alzheimer Society of Washington ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL OF WHATCOM SKAGIT ↗
- Who funds Whatcom Center for Early Learning ↗
- Who funds Kornerstone Kids PS ↗
- Who funds COMPASS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY AND ALUMNI ↗
- Who funds LHAQ'TEMISH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VAMOS OUTDOORS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ROAD2HOME ↗
- Who funds REBOUND OF WHATCOM COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE BELLINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM ALLIANCE FOR HEALTHCARE ACCESS C/O CHUCKANUT HEALTH FDN ↗
- Who funds MAX HIGBEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BELLINGHAM BAY ROTARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Interfaith Coalition of Whatcom County ↗
- Who funds RECREATION NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM FAMILY & COMMUNITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NW Hearts United ↗
- Who funds NAMI of Whatcom County ↗
- Who funds WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bellingham Technical College Foundation ↗
- Who funds COMMON THREADS FARM ↗
- Who funds Cascade Medical Advantage ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc ↗
- Who funds MT BAKER PLANNED PARENTHOOD ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WHATCOM COUNTY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Whatcom Community Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · North Sound Accountable Community of Health · Mount Baker Foundation · PeaceHealth · First Fed Foundation · United Way of Whatcom County · The Norcliffe Foundation · Eleanor and Henry Jansen Foundation · Jerry H Walton Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Riverstyx Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chuckanut Health Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.