Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$104kHousing & Shelter$100kCrime & Legal$100kYouth Development$89kFood & Nutrition$62kEducation$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kHealth$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP$15,040
HOPE ACADEMY FOR KIDS$15,000
INC CASA OF THE HEARTLAND$15,000
HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$5,000
FRIENDS OF HARDIN COUNTY ANIMALS INC$3,000
Project Learn Inc$3,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,500
FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOSPARUS INC: $5k → 15%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $10k → 13%HOSPARUS INC: $5k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $10k → 13%HOSPARUS INC: $3k → 15%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $10k → 13%HOSPARUS INC: $3k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $10k → 13%HOSPARUS INC: $3k → 15%HOSPARUS INC: $2k → 15%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $10k → 13%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $10k → 13%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $10k → 13%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $7k → 13%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $5k → 13%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $3k → 13%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $3k → 13%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $3k → 13%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $2k → 13%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $2k → 13%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Charlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$551k · 11 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$551k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+13%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CASA OF THE HEARTLAND
    9× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +143%
  • MH
    MISSION HOPE FOR KIDS INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $79k · revenue +89%
  • HH
    HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERBIG SISTER FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -15%
  • SI
    SPRINGHAVEN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +25%
  • GI
    GREENSPACE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shelter of Hope Inc

The shelter of hope's mission is to provide temporary, emergency shelter and permanent housing assistance for individuals and families in need of transitional services leading them to self-sufficiency. provisions are made without…

Housing & Shelter
2
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc

The hospice mission is to honor life through exceptional service and compassionate care. the organization is primarily engaged in providing care and support that enables the terminally ill to spend their final days in a comfortable and…

—
3
House of Hope of Kentucky Inc

To reach and help women who struggle with alcohol and chemical dependency; to offer assistance and resources to women while going through the rehabilitation process; to provide a safe environment and shelter to homeless women; to provide…

Health
4
Heartland Humane Society Ltd

Heartland humane society is a no-kill shelter for dogs and cats. the mission is to provide temporary shelter and care to homeless/lost animals, to educate the public on proper care of animals, and to promote neuter and spay programs.

Animals
5
Casa of Midwest Kentucky Inc

To provide advocacy for abused and neglected children in the hopkins, webster, henderson, union, muhlenberg, and crittenden county's courts, in schools, and in the community.

Civil Rights
6
Fresh Start Center Inc

The mission of high plains helping hands, inc is helping our neighbors in need. we offer provisions of food and basic living necessities. we offer encouragement and hope through prayer and the gospel of jesus christ. we actively seek other…

Human Services
7
Helping Hounds Find Homesinc

Saving the lives of homeless and unwanted pets in harrison county kentucky and surrounding areas.

Animals
8
House of Hope Animal Rescue Inc

To rescue, maintain, and place domestic animals abandoned in kill-shelters or discarded by volume breeders and to raise funds in order to accomplish our mission.

Animals
9
Christs Hands Inc

Organization operates a kitchen providing daily meals and housing opportunities serving harlan county and surrounding area. food boxes and personal items are also provided on a periodic basis.

Food & Nutrition
10
Heavenly Horse Haven Inc

It is our mission to help meet the need for a "safe haven" for horses or other farm animals who are at risk, neglected, abused, too expensive to keep, unwanted or otherwise in need of special care.

—
11
Hopkins County Humane Society

The mission of the hopkins county humane society is to ensure the humane and compassionate treatment of all animals.

Animals
12
Boyle County Habitat for Humanity

To provide clean, affordable housing for needy persons in boyle county, kentucky

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Home of the Innocents Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greenspace Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $99,813 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $37,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSHOPE ACADEMY FOR KIDS: $30,500 · OtherHOPE ACADEMY FOR KIDSSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP: $15,040 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORPPROJECT LEARN INC: $14,500 · OtherPROJECT LEARN INCProject Learn Inc: $9,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherHELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $75,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND OF HOPE IN…HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $33,500 · Human ServicesHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS H…THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOME OF THE INNOCEN…+1 more: $2,700 · Human ServicesCASA OF THE HEARTLAND: $99,643 · Crime & LegalCASA OF THE HEARTLA…MISSION HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $79,327 · Youth DevelopmentMISSION HOPE FO…FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $62,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMER…BIG BROTHERBIG SISTER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF HARDIN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $3,000 · AnimalsGREENSPACE INC: $2,000 · Environment
Other$210,853Human Services$122,200Crime & Legal$99,643Youth Development$79,327Food & Nutrition$62,000Philanthropy$5,000Animals$3,000Environment$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA OF THE HEARTLAND: $99,643 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetMISSION HOPE FOR KIDS INC: $79,327 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetHELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $75,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC: $62,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH: $33,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT LEARN INC: $14,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetTHE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERBIG SISTER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA OF THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds MISSION HOPE FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING AMERICA KENTUCKY'S HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPARUS INC HOSPARUS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT LEARN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME OF THE INNOCENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERBIG SISTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HARDIN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGHAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENSPACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Kentucky Community Foundation IncKY24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Kentucky Community Foundation Inc · Second Sixty Charitable Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Schmidt Family Foundation · United Way of Central Kentucky Inc · Dow Company Foundation · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char’s filings →

    More from the funding graph