Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2025
9
Organizations funded FY2024
22%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$15,040
Organizations funded a year
8 to 9
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$1.5M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 22% of the organizations Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char funded were first-time grantees, receiving 28% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving9$71k33%
FY20249$74k22%
FY20239$59k11%
FY20229$74k0%
FY20219$67k0%
FY20208$62k0%
FY20198$61k13%
FY20189$59k33%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$104kHousing & Shelter$100kCrime & Legal$100kYouth Development$89kFood & Nutrition$62kEducation$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kHealth$34kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Casa of the Heartland$99,64395%
Mission Hope for Kids Inc$79,32769%
Helping Hand of Hope Inc$75,00093%
Feeding America Kentucky's Heartland Inc$62,00090%
Hosparus Inc Hosparus Health$33,50080%
Salvation Army National Corp$15,0401n/a
Project Learn Inc$14,50043%
The Home of the Innocents Inc$11,00050%
Big Brotherbig Sister Foundation Inc$5,00013%
Friends of Hardin County Animal Shelter Inc$3,0001n/a
Springhaven Inc$2,7001n/a
Greenspace Inc$2,0001n/a

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($181k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCasa of the Heartland: $99,643 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetMission Hope for Kids Inc: $79,327 over 6y, 9.1% of budgetHelping Hand of Hope Inc: $75,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetFeeding America Kentucky's Heartland Inc: $62,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHosparus Inc Hosparus Health: $33,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetProject Learn Inc: $14,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetThe Home of the Innocents Inc: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brotherbig Sister Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Kentucky Community Foundation IncKY24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Kentucky Community Foundation Inc · Second Sixty Charitable Foundation Inc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Schmidt Family Foundation · United Way of Central Kentucky Inc · Dow Company Foundation · The Whas Crusade for Children Inc · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char with peer funders

About Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char

How much does Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char give?
Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char reported 9 grants totaling $71,040 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (18%), Housing & Shelter (17%), Crime & Legal (17%).
Who are Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Casa of the Heartland ($100k), Mission Hope for Kids Inc ($79k), Helping Hand of Hope Inc ($75k).
Does Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 22% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Central Kentucky Community Foundation Inc, Second Sixty Charitable Foundation Inc, Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc.
Where is Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char based?
Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Cofer Trigg Tuw Char’s filings →

More from the funding graph